User talk:Cartago90
March 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added content in an article, Wikimarketing, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Blogs are not reliable sources. Belbury (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
The article Wikimarketing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable fork of digital marketing sourced to a bunch of blogs, many of which are just dead links.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Wikimarketing for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimarketing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.