User talk:Casatkes
![]() | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Airguy (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
![]() | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Duggin (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
![]() | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of DavidDaws (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
![]() | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Aaa222ppp (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
![]() | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Wikilore (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
With all due respect to whomever labeled me as a sockpuppet, I am an entrepreneur familiar with Wikipedia who is able to read and write. I believe if you read anything I have added to the discussion on Frank Lorenzo it attempts to be neutral. My only motive for editing the site is that I have studied Frank Lorenzo and knew of the contentiousness of his history. I also saw that there were issues with his Wikipedia site as I have been working with online marketing, and when I explored myself, the evidence of bias in his article was OVERWHELMINGLY OBVIOUS.
The fact that I was just grouped into a blanket accusation of 5 other guys who I don't know is hysterical. I will continue to edit other sites and create my profile.
Thanks. Casatkes (talk) 20:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)