Jump to content

User talk:Ceciwrites

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: OT9 BENO 8FS (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ceciwrites! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Information icon

Hello Ceciwrites. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ceciwrites. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ceciwrites|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As noted already, interns are considered paid editors even if you are not paid in money, as interns are compensated with the experience of the work. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


@331dot: Noted, thank you so much I appreciate your time and knowledge. I will not write this article as it is causing a great problem. I will write about other things --Ceciwrites talk 11:59, 4 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Ceciwrites, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! bonadea contributions talk 11:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Ceciwrites! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to submit a copyright and retrieve deleted article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]