User talk:Celeryqueen

Celeryqueen, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Celeryqueen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jude Cook (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More references are needed to establish notability of the subject involved and verify the claims made in this article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jude Cook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 01:12, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I'm relatively new to Wikipedia & finding it very confusing. When I go to Tseung Kwan O's talk page it says “The NYTimes reviews is a sufficient source for the notability of Jude Cook” so I'm now very confused as to why it has been declined yet again. La Mona, thank you for fixing the references, which, again, I've found quite difficult. I've edited on Wikipedia before but never written an entry from scratch. All my edits have always been accepted. As for the "meh reviews" we'll have to agree to disagree; I found the reviews balanced. What's more the novel was published by major publishing houses in both the UK & the US, which I had assumed would qualify as notable. But if any editor has a moment, please could you explain the apparent contradiction between the statement on Tseung Kwan O's talk page & the decline of the submission? Thank you very much.Celeryqueen (talk) 07:50, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jude Cook has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jude Cook. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 01:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jude Cook has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jude Cook. Thanks! 333 -blue 11:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jude Cook has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jude Cook. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 20:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jude Cook (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jude Cook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 21:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]