User talk:Celestina007/Archives/2021/September

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Administrators' newsletter – September 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).

Administrator changes

readded Jake Wartenberg
removed Emperor • Viridian Bovary
renamed Ashleyyoursmile → Viridian Bovary

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Gyaldem Tish and Koo Ntakra

Hello, I took a bold step in learning how nominate articles for deletion. I came across these two. Kindly have a look at them and review + a vote based on what you think. Thanks. Ampimd (talk) 16:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I did not get any feedback from you. I noticed from the messages from the talk page that you are unwell. Have a Speedy recovery. I wish you well. Ampimd (talk) 18:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Wikipedia Essays Barnstar
Thank you for creating excellent Wikipedia essays regarding its policies and guidelines which many editors may find helpful while editing or working here. Best Regrads. — A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 12:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
@A.A Prinon, thanks I appreciate this. Celestina007 (talk) 20:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

I’m still waiting

Dear Celestina007,

I’m still waiting on you on the Lonadek I asked you to check.

Thanks I’m anticipation.

Regards,

B.Korlah B.Korlah (talk) 10:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Do you have any connection with the organization? Are you employed there? Have you been contacted by an employee to create this? Do you have a vested interest in this article? If the answer to any of the aforementioned is yes, please do state so, if your answer is no, then we move into the second phase, in this phase we address the tone, the current wording of the article makes it borderline WP:CSD#G11 worthy. The tone of the article is off, see WP:ADMASQ, WP:PROMO and see WP:NPOV having addressed this we move into the final phase where we access notability, which I believe is what you want accessed, please see WP:RS and point me to any WP:THREE solid sources that discuss the organization with WP:INDEPTH Significant coverage. If you are unable to provide this, it invariably means the article isn’t mainspace worthy. Moving forward if you are having difficulties in comprehending the concept of notability or how sourcing works, an alternative method is to use the WP:AFC method to submit the article. Celestina007 (talk) 12:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Celestina007/Archives/2021,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Chirag Sethi (Actor)

Hi Celestina007, in response to your comment, I would like to share with you that yes Chirag Sethi has played leading roles in the mentioned movies and series. I believe the person holds notability as he appeared in many reliable sources and that too as a main topics. Mecrosspro (talk) 17:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello @Mecrosspro, it appears TheBirdsShedTears, & Nomadicghumakkad do not seem to share this sentiment and honestly speaking neither do I. Can you confirm or expressly explain why you think any criterion from WP:NACTOR is met? Furthermore submitting articles in quick succession after a decline is somewhat frustrating for reviewers. I think moving forward if you haven’t already, attempt to be in communication with reviewers who declined the article but I note that TBST said the subject of the article falls under WP:TOOSOON if that is the case here then there isn’t much anyone can do, unfortunately you’d have to wait it out until such a time the subject of your article meets WP:SIGCOV or WP:INDEPTH, I’m sorry if this wasn’t the response you were expecting. Celestina007 (talk) 22:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I didn't find any notable projects (notable project would mean that the project itself has significant coverage that it can hold a wiki page if it doesn't have one now) that had a lead role. By lead we would mean the central protagonist who has the max screen time or let's say the second max screen time. So what we need is Notable Project AND Lead Role AND Multiple (at least two). The sources are very hollow and doesn't talk about the actor's work in depth. I said the same thing at my talk page that TheBirdsShedTears is saying. The topic might become notable in future when there are leading roles or there is substantial coverage. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 21:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, i have added some more sources and added content as per wikipedia guideline. Please review and tell me if there is something else left. He have worked in bollywood movies, have worked with big celebrities (as already written in draft). In holiday movie his screen time was more than 30 minutes. aman (talk) 03:15, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Approx 1 hour screen time in inside edge web series. And second lead role in nanu ki janu movie. His screen time was 30 minutes approx in thuppakki (tamil movie) and later on he also shared same screen time in bollywood version of thuppakki movie which is Akshay kumar’s holiday a soldier is never off duty. aman (talk) 03:21, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

As per WP:NACTOR, these are the points which makes a person notable to be on wikipedia… and this acTor have it all. So i request you to please review it again please.

Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, pornographic actors,models, and celebrities:

Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; or Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. aman (talk) 03:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Celestina007/Archives/2021/September&oldid=1060993571"