User talk:Central Mountain

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chiang Kai-shek. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Nlu (talk) 18:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your controversial edits[edit]

I notice you are making a lot of politically controversial edits. Let me suggest that you try to discuss your desired changes on the talk pages of the affected articles first. If your changes do not reflect consensus they will simply be reverted. --Ideogram 01:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, just removing references to Taiwan everywhere will be reverted. To the west, the state is known primarily as Taiwan, and referring to it only with the China name will confuse western users immensely. Please stop removing these references. -- Chris 73 | Talk 01:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will tell you that I am not doing that. Simply some instances need to be corrected. Taiwan can still be there. But Republic of China (Taiwan) is not the country's name. It has to be the facts. Central Mountain 01:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit war. You will be blocked if you revert more than three times. --Ideogram 01:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i am not. I am adding disambugatino for articles by doing Republic of China, now based in Taiwan. Central Mountain 01:10, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you realize now that you cannot get your way by simply reverting. You will have discuss and establish consensus if you want anything to change. --Ideogram 01:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot even edit on other people's talk pages[edit]

How can i discuss if I cannot even do that??? Niohe what is your problem? Some of the edits were fair constructive edits. You simply eliminate all my edits. If you are going to do that, then what is the point of other people joining Wikipedia. I'm through with you crazy people. Niohe shame on you Central Mountain 01:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked. You can edit article talk pages. --Ideogram 02:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, please read WP:NPOV. --Nlu (talk) 08:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please assume good faith. Niohe is doing his/her best to discuss w/ you.--Jerrypp772000 18:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe he's not, but you're not either. So, please discuss in talk pages.--Jerrypp772000 20:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zhongshan, my user page is semi-protected and can only be edited by established users. You are more than welcome to discuss your edits here or elsewhere. A number of editors, me included did not find your edits very helpful, so we reverted them. I may have a mistake, so please let me know which of your edits you find constructive.--Niohe 23:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of DeChiangcization[edit]

An editor has nominated DeChiangcization, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeChiangcization and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]