User talk:Cergo123

December 2019

Hello, I'm S0091. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Grammarly have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 16:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 16:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

August 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 11:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cergo123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I read more about the guidelines and will comply with them because I was not affiliated with any party at the first place and when I posted about topics like QuillBot, it is a famous tool and doesn't need a page on Wikipedia and it is the field I have some knowledge about it.Cergo123 (talk) 12:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are either trying to mislead us now or were trying to mislead us when you uploaded File:Quillbot.png and specifically claimed you personally own the copyright to the QuillBot logo. Either way, best to leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 12:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cergo123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe the admin didn't spend time to read my previous appeal, I was not sure about the reason that she/he blocked me, I just uploaded an image and didn't claim it is my own work, but it was done by the tool I used, for that I will be more careful in future and I hope to get me unbanned since it came from a mistake and was not intended Cergo123 (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

And the image Yamla referenced is not the only image you have claimed as your own work, in looking at your edits. Even if I accept what you say- and I don't- that would mean you lack the knowledge of copyright needed to upload images. This, combined with your attempted block evasion, leads me to decline this request. Until and unless you are fully honest with us, there is no pathway forward here. 331dot (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cergo123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 46.161.195.130. It is a shared IP (used by too many houses) there is no web hosting service and I am a human being, so please unban it. Cergo123 (talk) 16:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. This is a nonsense unblock request and indicates you've been trying to WP:EVADE your block. This will count against you when someone else reviews the above unblock request. Yamla (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cergo123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please explain what you mean by "be honest with us" I have been blocked 2 years ago and the only reason mentioned by the admin is that the copyright image that I (my mistake) claimed to be mine, and now I should remember what he/she was thinking that night? I am clear I want you to unban me because the mentioned reason is not enough to lifetime ban, and also I applied at the same time to unban my IP (I even was not in the same country at that time) but she/he is claiming that applying to 2 unblocks at the same time prove something in his/her own mind, which is not a fair reason to reject the both. Cergo123 (talk) 20:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Enough. All you have been doing the last day is dancing around, as noted in the other declines. I will be revoking your talk page access after saving this so you won't further waste our time and yours. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)