User talk:Cgrooms123

This is Cgrooms123's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fat Angelo's (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NCOMPANY - lacks WP:CORPDEPTH. The company's website is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fat Angelo's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fat Angelo's, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cgrooms123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 15:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cgrooms123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do apologized, I edited article that I had a conflict of interest in and I declared that on my talk page. I had this account for years and I am new to following the correct protocol of wikipedia which I apologize for. I do not use this account for spam Cgrooms123 (talk) 16:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Since you don't intend to make any edits at this time, there is no need to remove the block, since blocks only prevent editing. If you later have an edit you wish to make, you may request unblock at that time. There is no deadline for this, so take all the time you need. Note that you are a paid editor if you edit about the company you work for, you do not have to be specifically paid for your edits or specifically directed to edit by your boss. 331dot (talk) 10:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The only edits you have ever made have been about you, or your company. If unblocked, what articles would you edit? SQL ^{Query me!} 19:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I made edits to the company I work for but by no means did I receive money for this or was it for advertising and I made note of that in my talk page as per COI page says to. Honestly if I was unblocked I would make no edits because I am still learning. I spent hours talking and researching with others on how to navigate Wikipedia. Thank you again for you time Cgrooms123 (talk) 19:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Cgrooms123! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:11, Thursday, January 7, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cgrooms123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do apologized, I edited article that I had a conflict of interest in and I declared that on my talk page. I had this account for years and I am new to following the correct protocol of wikipedia which I apologize for. I do not use this account for spam Cgrooms123 (talk) 16:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Since you don't intend to make any edits at this time, there is no need to remove the block, since blocks only prevent editing. If you later have an edit you wish to make, you may request unblock at that time. There is no deadline for this, so take all the time you need. Note that you are a paid editor if you edit about the company you work for, you do not have to be specifically paid for your edits or specifically directed to edit by your boss. 331dot (talk) 10:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The only edits you have ever made have been about you, or your company. If unblocked, what articles would you edit? SQL ^{Query me!} 19:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I made edits to the company I work for but by no means did I receive money for this or was it for advertising and I made note of that in my talk page as per COI page says to. Honestly if I was unblocked I would make no edits because I am still learning. I spent hours talking and researching with others on how to navigate Wikipedia. Thank you again for you time Cgrooms123 (talk) 19:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cgrooms123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting that this account be removed from blocked. I have been learning a lot more about Wikipedia and started to familiarizing myself with how to navigate and edit articles started to even take the WP:ADVENTURE Course. My goal is to make minor edits to companies in the pizza industry. I ultimate goal would be to write an article and get it published. I been apart of this community for years and I am still learning being blocked allows me to do nothing. Thank you in advance Cgrooms123 (talk) 19:43, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have a conflict of interest in this area; an unblock request should contain an agreement not to edit in this area and propose alternatives. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not remove declined unblock requests while you are blocked. I have replaced the declined request, and related comments above. SQL ^{Query me!} 21:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just asking for my account to be unblocked as you said you can request anytime to unblock if I wish to make edits. Thank you Cgrooms123 (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You already know you are not going to be unblocked "to make contributions to mostly food related articles", because you claim you now understand our policies. You are in danger of losing access to this talk page, as you are either trolling or aren't listening or don't understand. I very strongly suggest you modify your open unblock request and tell us what you'll write about instead. --Yamla (talk) 23:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize I am not trolling maybe I do not fully understand this just yet sorry Cgrooms123 (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.