User talk:Cha20raca
Help me!
[edit]This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... Please help me protect a page I have been working on editing. It is consistently getting vandalized by a person who has been stalking me for awhile. Link is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_L._Bissell_Jr. Cha20raca (talk) 06:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- I've requested page protection at WP:RFPP. Kleinpecan (talk) 07:47, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- THANK YOU so very much. The edit I have in is pertinent to the wikipedia. Is there away to put it in there. They just keep on purpose vandalizing the page, so it can't be edited properly. Cha20raca (talk) 07:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Cite a source that actually supports the claim you're making. Anything less will get reverted off. This is a hard requirement and we will not budge on this. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 07:55, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. Where should I cite it? I appreciate so much your help on this! Cha20raca (talk) 07:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, if you can just tell me where I should make this request, and what I should do to give citation on the page. Thank you again for being so helpful. I really appreciate it. Cha20raca (talk) 08:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- The citation should be at the end of the sentence that makes the claim (or, for particularly long sentences, immediately after the claim). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 08:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello A little blue Bori, will this citation be verified by an admin of the site? I can confirm that this is not pertinent information at all, and I do not wish to see an article claiming it is a citation when it is not. MasDeku (talk) 08:14, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- If it's not relevant to the article, then that's more reason to get rid of it. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 08:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Lillee Jean is a direct relative to Brenda Lee Marks Wolf. Lillee Jean on Google Trends has spiked in the last year, is verified on all platforms, thus is extremely relative. This was her aunt. Your opinion on this is void, when the fact of heritage is in question, not opinion. Please stop vandalizing the page. Cha20raca (talk) 08:23, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Lillee Jean is not related or relevant to Nicholas L. Bissell Jr. (The man the Wikipedia is about) or the murder of Brenda Wolf. Being related to Brenda is not relevant for this article. MasDeku (talk) 08:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- This person is what one would call a troll. They have been harassing Brenda Wolf's family for three years. Brenda Wolf is integral to the end of Bissell, since it was the last murder he took money for, and was one of the last cases to add to him being federally charged. Now (Redacted) stop getting into our lives. Thank you. Thanks little blue Bori, we have spoken to an admin and are having this written a different way. Cha20raca (talk) 17:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Please be informed that I have no personal issue with Brenda's murder being included in the Wikipedia of Nicholas Bissell. Lillee Jean, however, has no place in the article as it is irrelevant to Nicholas Bissell or the murder of Brenda Wolf. Again, being related to Brenda is not relevant to the Wikipedia page at hand.
- This person is what one would call a troll. They have been harassing Brenda Wolf's family for three years. Brenda Wolf is integral to the end of Bissell, since it was the last murder he took money for, and was one of the last cases to add to him being federally charged. Now (Redacted) stop getting into our lives. Thank you. Thanks little blue Bori, we have spoken to an admin and are having this written a different way. Cha20raca (talk) 17:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Lillee Jean is not related or relevant to Nicholas L. Bissell Jr. (The man the Wikipedia is about) or the murder of Brenda Wolf. Being related to Brenda is not relevant for this article. MasDeku (talk) 08:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello A little blue Bori, will this citation be verified by an admin of the site? I can confirm that this is not pertinent information at all, and I do not wish to see an article claiming it is a citation when it is not. MasDeku (talk) 08:14, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- The citation should be at the end of the sentence that makes the claim (or, for particularly long sentences, immediately after the claim). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 08:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Cite a source that actually supports the claim you're making. Anything less will get reverted off. This is a hard requirement and we will not budge on this. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 07:55, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- THANK YOU so very much. The edit I have in is pertinent to the wikipedia. Is there away to put it in there. They just keep on purpose vandalizing the page, so it can't be edited properly. Cha20raca (talk) 07:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
@Cha20raca: If I were to give you my opinion, I would probably oppose the inclusion of this. First, the reference you provided (Lillee Jean's Web site) doesn't mention Brenda Lee Marks Wolf. I tried searching this and I couldn't find anything aside from several lolcow.farm posts (which are not reliable sources). Second, how exactly is this relevant? The article is primarily about Nicholas L. Bissell and, to some extent, the murder of Brenda. Lillee doesn't seem to be related to either of these things.
@MasDeku: What is your relationship to User:LilleeJeanCloutChasingFraud and User:JilleeLean? I hope you know that abusing multiple accounts is not allowed. Kleinpecan (talk) 09:14, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- You are not related to Brenda Wolf please exist the conversation. This is someone who has been stalking my daughter for three years on the internet. Cha20raca (talk) 17:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
@Kleinpecan: I have no personal relation to either of those two accounts, nor are they mine. This is my only account. Another website shared a screenshot showing that Lillee Jean was mentioned in this article, so I came to it to try and fix it because it is irrelevant. My guess is those other two accounts realized the same and were trying to fix it as well. MasDeku (talk) 09:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- MasDeku those two accounts are you which are LilleeJeanClout and JilleeLean and you can tell by the idiotic names they are trying to once again "cyberbully" a kid. Cha20raca (talk) 17:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Cha20raca, I can confirm that those two accounts are not mine. Wikipedia can find that out through my IP if they wish to do so. Please keep to the topic at hand. Several admins of the website have informed you that Lillee Jean is not relevant information to either Nicholas L. Bissell or to the death of Brenda Wolf. Another admin has called out to have the entire paragraph of Brenda removed as it as very little to do with Nicholas himself. Please stop adding very vague or irrelevant information to this page. MasDeku (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- That's fine. We are going to ask someone to create the separate page for her. Know though that I am not the three strange accounts that came in here. Cha20raca (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Cha20raca, I can confirm that those two accounts are not mine. Wikipedia can find that out through my IP if they wish to do so. Please keep to the topic at hand. Several admins of the website have informed you that Lillee Jean is not relevant information to either Nicholas L. Bissell or to the death of Brenda Wolf. Another admin has called out to have the entire paragraph of Brenda removed as it as very little to do with Nicholas himself. Please stop adding very vague or irrelevant information to this page. MasDeku (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
I would also like to point out that this article is about Nicholas Bissell, not Brenda Wolf. Brenda Wolf's case was one of many he worked on. Lillee Jean does not have any relevance to the case, nor to Nicholas Bissell's career. Janjakim (talk) 10:20, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- I see (Redacted) created FOUR irrelevant accounts. It doesn't matter. (Redacted) has won nothing except once again momentarily upsetting my family which is her usual style. This is three years and it is invasive. Find a family of your own, because surely you have none since you're sitting here interfering with mine. Cha20raca (talk) 17:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
(Redacted), you are so selfish and so determined to put LJ's name in a Wikipedia article that now the entire paragraph about Brenda's case will be removed and you have nobody but yourself to blame for it. Janjakim (talk) 18:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you to wiki staff for refusing to allow irrelevant connections based on entitled minds to be added 24.235.141.197 (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Nicholas L. Bissell Jr.. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kleinpecan (talk) 07:47, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello the page is being edited by someone who is trying to trash the page and put derogatory information in. Is there away for you to protect the page at least temporarily? I know they did that on the everpedia. Appreciate so much your help. Cha20raca (talk) 07:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not really—only an admin can do this. As seen above, I've requested page protection. Kleinpecan (talk) 07:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. Is there an admin I can contact? Kind of new with this stuff so feeling my way around. Thank you for being amazing. Cha20raca (talk) 07:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not really—only an admin can do this. As seen above, I've requested page protection. Kleinpecan (talk) 07:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Yes, please lock this article. Nicholas Bissell. If Brenda Wolf was related to a worldwide known celebrity, perhaps this would be a piece of interesting trivia. But Lillee jean is a girl who has a YouTube channel with 18k subscribers, garnering 2k-3k per video. She is hardly celebrity status and does not have any direct link to Nicholas Bissell, not Brenda Wolf's death. Janjakim (talk) 10:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Nicholas L. Bissell Jr.
[edit]This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Nicholas L. Bissell Jr., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Here's a better explanation. The now blocked editor was adding unsourced and, what appeared to me to be, very serious WP:BLP violations. Their user name was also a violation of the BLP. Another editor removed the problematic material and you then edit warred to restore it. This was probably an accident but the material was bad enough that I felt it best to hide the material. Make sure to look at what you are reverting. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi L
[edit]I think it is good that you reported us for sock puppetry (kinda ironic tho given your history with sock accounts). At least when they check our IPs and tell you they are different, (Redacted). Janjakim (talk) 17:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
sick puppetry...lol 24.235.141.197 (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake Accounts
[edit]Would one of the Wiki admins be kind enough to help me block the fake accounts in my talk page harassing me? Cha20raca (talk) 17:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Cha20raca: Since this is your user talk page, you are permitted to remove the harassing messages sent by other users. (Per WP:OWNTALK) ✌️ The owner of all 🗸 01:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit]A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 17:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Janjakim. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. bonadea contributions talk 17:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Actually the way that person talked they sounded just like the stalker who’s been doing this 3 years. I do apologize and hope you’ll understand we have been thru hell and it continues until this ends legally. Cha20raca (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Justiyaya (talk) 17:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
June 2021
[edit]I have blocked you from editing Nicholas L. Bissell Jr. for repeatedly adding inappropriate and off topic content to that article. You can discuss the matter at Talk: Nicholas L. Bissell Jr. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)