User talk:Chachaching

October 2016

Hello, I'm JudeccaXIII. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Book of Judith. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JudeccaXIII (talk) 04:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Legal rights

You have no legal rights here. We give you the right to edit so long as you follow our policies and guidelines, including WP:NOTCENSORED, which is basic policy. If you ignore them you are likely to have your right to edit removed (be blocked) by me or another editor with the Administrative rights. Doug Weller talk 16:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also WP:DISC. Wikipedia's legal bases are covered in this matter. clpo13_(talk) 16:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, that image isn't obscene under US law, see United States obscenity law. Doug Weller talk 16:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a prosecuting attorney; however my soul knoweth right well, and you are carelessly publicizing a pornographic painting where minors can easily be morally corrupted by it. You are not even hiding behind a notice of age restricted content that is read prior to viewing the images on your site. At this point, I must ask you to consider the eternal cost. Repent and seek the forgiveness of God freely given to you through Jesus Christ who died on the cross for your sins. Only the Son of God can keep your heart from growing cold. --Chachaching (talk) 03:07, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]