Jump to content

User talk:Chaleb96/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm really impressed that you included a table of contents! Jmmcabee (talk) 15:22, 19 April 2017 (UTC)jmmcabee[reply]

Comments on ideas draft[edit]

Sounds like you are ready to run with the Vaccinium page. If you go with that page, you need to carefully what should be included on this page for the general Wikipedia user. Presumably, many people who are interested might go directly to a page like the Burke Museum page. I think you could find some more recent information on thermotropism, but there are likely other terms that could be used for searching. You might be more likely to learn something about plant behavior with this topic. Jmmcabee (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)jmmcabee[reply]

Comments on Article Revision[edit]

Your text looks neutral and appropriate for Wikipedia. You are just adding the ethnobotany part, right/ Can you work in something about adaptation or physiology since this is a physiology class? Jmmcabee (talk)jmmcabee —Preceding undated comment added 19:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chaleb96 (talk) 03:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)I can definitely add something about physiology. I found a couple of articles that talk about root structure physiology but I haven't figured out how to integrate them well yet.Chaleb96 (talk) 03:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review One[edit]

I really liked the neutrality of your article. It felt as if I was reading off of a wiki page directly, so I think you are doing awesome! My only concern, and I saw that it was suggested you include it due to the nature of the class, is that the physiology part feels unnecessary - most likely due to it's length! Either I would omit it or expand it even just a sentence or two. Other than that everything looks good to go! Ltmansfield (talk) 23:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

I really like how you incorporated a little history about Vaccinium deliciosum and pictures of the whole plant because on the berries were shown in the original article. Also, it's nice how you have several articles to prevent biased information. Will you expand the physiology section? I thought it was interesting hearing that the fruits have as many as 31 aromatic flavor compounds! Now I know more about blueberry! Espressoself (talk) 06:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]