User talk:Chamosuhdod

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Chamosuhdod, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Chamosuhdod, good luck, and have fun. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:25, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohamed Aarab (December 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohamed Aarab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lopifalko (talk) 15:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chamosuhdod! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lopifalko (talk) 15:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohamed Aarab (December 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohamed Aarab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lopifalko (talk) 18:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohamed Aarab (December 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no indication that they pass WP:NMUSICIAN or WP:GNG?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohamed Aarab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mohamed Aarab has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mohamed Aarab. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it, but I did not understand its meaning well. What improvement do you mean? Chamosuhdod (talk) 19:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AS per the previous decline "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added" you have re-submitted it WITHOUT addressing the reason it was declined, this can be seen as disruptive editing. Theroadislong (talk) 20:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added more than 3 sources in this last article, but to no avail. As I said before, there are articles that contain only two sources or less, and they were accepted without coordination in writing. I hope to try to accept them to improve and strengthen them while trying to add New sources when available Chamosuhdod (talk) 20:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's a lot of articles that didn't go through a draft process; frankly, a few of them may need to be deleted, and some need to be tagged with maintenance templates. If you want to look at articles that are well-written and well-sourced, look at our featured and good articles; you'd want an article that, eventually, could be a featured article, not one that ends up being deleted. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 20:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and this is my goal. All I want is a distinctive article with reliable sources, and among all of this is an article that has been reviewed by editors more knowledgeable than me. But in the draft that I created, I added everything, some paragraphs were referred to, and I added sources, but all of this was not approved. All of the sources that I added are reliable, proving what is written in the article. I hope you will reconsider the article and tell me the things I add so that it will be accepted. Thank you Chamosuhdod (talk) 20:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After putting a few sources through Google translate (not the best way to do things, especially non-Latin, but better than nothing), the sources seem to be talking about new releases on YouTube, and appear to have similar phrasing with each other. Are these press releases? Is Aarab somehow involved in the making of these sources? I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 01:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are reliable journalistic sources and they talk about new publications. The name of Mohamed Aarab is also mentioned in these sources. You will find it written in Arabic, and I added his name in Arabic to the article. Chamosuhdod (talk) 06:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohamed Aarab (December 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI. See also WP:BLP. All statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed. Also ensure sources work and are useful for verifying the statements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohamed Aarab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 16:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mohamed Aarab has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mohamed Aarab. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chamosuhdod (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think there is a misunderstanding. I did not do anything that violates the rules of Wikipedia. I do not know why I was banned from editing, and the account that was referred to on my discussion page does not belong to me and is not my account

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a government with laws, so no one has said you have done something illegal. You created a draft about Mohamed Aarab, which a blocked user has attempted to do. It's difficult to accept this as a coincidence- but anyone who attempts to edit about Mohamed Aarab will be blocked as a sock puppet. 331dot (talk) 18:07, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are permitted only one unblock request at a time.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But why did you block me? I did not do anything illegal and I do not make advertisements or anything like that. I hope you reconsider. Chamosuhdod (talk) 16:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]