User talk:Chan-ocha

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Chan-ocha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! E Eng 05:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to your recent edits, many educational institutions receive donations from prominent people, including royalty. There simply isn't space, nor is it appropriate, for a photograph of all such donors to appear in the articles on these institutions. In most cases, the articles won't even mention such donors, unless they are very important to the history of the school. E Eng 05:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not nice. Thanks for the welcome though.--Chan-ocha (talk) 05:27, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean about it not being nice, but it's the way things have to be. There's a real need for foreign-language editors here, and I'm sure there are many Thailand-related articles to which you can contribute. E Eng 05:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. There are now multiple editors reverting your mass-adding of photos of the Thai royal family to various articles. Please understand that information (and images) are not added to articles just because it's true; it needs to add to the reader's understanding of the subject. Please raise your proposal on the talk page of one or two of these articles, so other editors can comment. I believe you will then begin to understand why what you're doing is inappropriate. E Eng 05:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the addition of that photo to the article as I agree that it does not warrant inclusion in Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Meters (talk) 05:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

Caution[edit]

If you keep adding that image to articles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think Chan-ocha understands now. It's the kind of mistake new editors often make. E Eng 06:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chan-ocha, my apologies for being harsh. I thought you had been reverted and were restoring the images again and again. Looking at your contributions, I see now that that is not so.

As for the king, when I was in Thailand many years ago, I remember that people loved him so, so much. In fact, I have never seen a people having so much love for their king. He must have been a great inspiration and I am guessing you loved him very much. I am sorry about his passing.

If there is anything you ever need or have any questions, please ask. Again, my apologies for overreacting. Thank you, and happy editing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New York Institute of Technology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Please don't add any images that don't have anything to do with the subject of the page. Crboyer (talk) 07:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at New York Institute of Technology, you may be blocked from editing. Replacing images with off-topic ones is disruptive. All due respect to the Royal Family.Crboyer (talk) 07:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Princeton University. Please don't replace images with ones that don't have anything to do with the subject of the page. Crboyer (talk) 07:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 08:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]