User talk:Charhall
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Charhall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages with
~~~~so others will know who left which comments. - The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
- How to edit a page and write a great article
- The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
- The handy Manual of Style
- And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing!
-- Sango123 20:40, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
- Thanks for posting a question on my talk page. Your edit was reverted because the existing links are general, while the link you added pertained to a specific person. It doesn't seem fair that a certain victim should receive her own memorial link while others do not. Regards, Sango123 18:35, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
- I respect your argument, but when User:Dystopos removed your link, he pointed out Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not in his edit summary. I believe he was referring to this. Sango123 19:08, July 25, 2005 (UTC) (P.S. Please don't hesitate to adjust the sentence you pointed out if it doesn't seem to adhere to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.)
- My reference was to item 4: Wikipedia is not a memorial. Dystopos 21:14, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- I respect your argument, but when User:Dystopos removed your link, he pointed out Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not in his edit summary. I believe he was referring to this. Sango123 19:08, July 25, 2005 (UTC) (P.S. Please don't hesitate to adjust the sentence you pointed out if it doesn't seem to adhere to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.)
- I'm putting the sentence back. The characterization of Evans' exocution as "tortuous" is dictionary-definition, not POV. The equally indisputable fact that it is cited by opponents of capital punishment in the United States is the main reason Evans' case is notable. Dystopos 21:14, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Ertman and Pena[edit]
Oh, I thought the photo was of both Pena and Ertman - as one lady in that photo looks exactly the same as Pena does in her individual photo. Also, by "dead" I meant that the indicated relevant subjects are dead. While the man in the photo is still alive, the point of the photo was to show the murder victims, who are dead (and therefore it is likely not possible to find a freely licensed photo of them) WhisperToMe (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC)