User talk:Charliehdb
Sreeleela[edit]
Hi @Charliehdb, in your recent revert on the Sreeleela page, you suggested that the previous edit was a case of vandalism. I very much doubt this to be true: the unregistered editor had simply removed content whose inclusion in the lede seems dubious even to me, and they provided an edit summary for it. This does not constitute vandalism, though of course, it can be argued that the edit is misplaced, even potentially disruptive. The accusation of vandalism should be used sparingly and only in cases where there is clear intent to deface an article. Cheers! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)