Jump to content

User talk:Charlottefarhan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Peracha[edit]

Hello Charlottefarhan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sarah Peracha for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Hisonjsph (talk) 08:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Darya Pino has been reverted.
Your edit here to Darya Pino was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/summertomato) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Sarmad Tariq. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. SMS Talk 17:13, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charlottefarhan, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Charlottefarhan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SMS Talk 18:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Peracha[edit]

Please don't delete tags from articles without addressing the points they raise. The whole article on Peracha only has two source, one is a blog and the other a Youtube link. Neither blogs nor Youtube normally constitute what are consdiered to be WP:reliable sources. If she is genuinely notable then you should be able to find better sources that these. Nthep (talk) 11:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination of Sarah Peracha for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Peracha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Peracha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EdwardH (talk) 07:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Sarah Peracha, with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStartalk 08:55, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Charlottefarhan. You have new messages at MelbourneStar's talk page.
Message added 10:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

MelbourneStartalk 10:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Punjab, Pakistan. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk to me 07:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]