User talk:Charlottegatsby

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Charlottegatsby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —GFOLEY FOUR— 03:38, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andrew Paskoff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Paskoff for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Paskoff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Paskoff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's clear based on track record, TV shows, experience and companies, both Andrew and Scott Paskoff are worthy of Wiki inclusion.

Please advise as to why Scott Paskoff page was deleted without discussion?

Thank you.

Good morning, Liz. I was hoping we could have a discussion about Scott Paskoff page as well. Scott along with his twin brother , Andrew are pioneers of reality TV, having produced and worked for most networks and production companies in the industry. It's a bit confusing why these upstanding members of society, a TV Academy Member, creator of series on Television would be in question of meeting proper guidelines. If anything, they fit right in as respected executives within the industry and a proven track record of success in the entertainment business.

I welcome a discussion to bring Scott Paskoff's page back in good standing, while Andrew Paskoff should remain on Wikipedia.

Please advise.

Thank you.

Scott