User talk:Check77

Some messages, or message parts are deleted because of Spam.

Warning about possibly incorrect original research[edit]

Hi there. Please do not delete this message! This is very important, as multiple users have expressed concerns about your edits, and if you continue to ignore those concerns you could wind up getting blocked. We are not nearly to that point yet, but it is critical that you engage us in dialog so that we can come to an understanding.

Another user, NE2 (talk · contribs), said here that he felt you were confused about the renaming of NY route numbers beginning with a 4. He expressed a concern that you had engaged in original research, which is prohibited by Wikipedia policies regarding WP:No original research and WP:Verifiability. In addition, he thought your original research might also be mistaken.

Please respond at the relevant section here, so that we can start to come to an understanding. Thanks! --Jaysweet (talk) 19:58, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bearian (talk) 18:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This [1] is the final straw. Bearian (talk) 20:42, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And this: [2]? Bearian (talk) 20:44, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved[edit]

I've moved your latest thread to WP:ANI#Jaysweet sent me a message reguarding NE2... —Wknight94 (talk) 18:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion you're looking for is here. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 19:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Please discuss your changes on the article talk page Seddσn ^talk ^{Editor Review} 20:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of State Routes in New York. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also please note this noticeboard thread. He's not only at 6RR, he's opened a frivolous noticeboard thread and is blanking and altering other people's posts. Durova^Charge! 21:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have erased evidence of prior warnings from myself and from other users. Further vandalism and/or inclusion of original research will not be tolerated, and will result in longer blocks. However, I will try to assume good faith. Bearian (talk) 00:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]