Jump to content

User talk:Checker Fred 2.0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2019[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- zzuuzz (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Checker Fred 2.0 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

While I do appreciate CaptainDanger25's edits on my draft pages, I should of been the person who should be editing the pages. I know this user personally and asked him to help make edits on my draft articles.Checker Fred 2.0 (talk) 15:20, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

 Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk)​ 16:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This block is unrelated to who edits which articles. More interesting is your relationship to User:Checker Fred, and why you were editing from exactly the same places as both Simulation12 and CaptainDanger25, as well as some other abusive accounts. And User:CaptainDanger25 can also read this. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:34, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzuuzz: ::@Bbb23:
My relation to CaptainDanger25 is just my co-admin on the Henry Danger wiki, he suggested that I come here and create an account on Wikipedia, since I was complaining that Last Man Standing didn't have serrate episode pages. I was going to name my account Checker Fred, but saw that was taken, so I added the 2.0 part.

Checker Fred 2.0 (talk) 16:17, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Zzuuzz: For the person attacking CaptainDanger25, that is a user on our Henry Danger wiki and several other wiki's as we saw noticed two of the same accounts Benedictfoos and FullerHouseFan01. They are socks of each other and were blocked for blanking pages then later attacking Bigteddy1 on there. They somehow managed to gain control of his account here. Other then knowing each other on the Henry Danger wiki, I didn't use his computer to create my account as we live in two different states. This is the only account I created here. May I ask how this account came to your attention? What pages have me and CaptainDanger25 exactly edited that are the same with Simulation12 besides the draft pages? Are you able to open a sock case to prove that were are socks of each other?

CaptainDanger25 wants me to ask you why you are bring this up now when before you said he wasn't a sock of simulation12Checker Fred 2.0 (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Checker Fred 2.0 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The only other account I created was User:Checker Fred, I was caught up in sockpuppet cases and should of stayed out. My Checker Fred account remained unrelated but then admins determined my account to be related for some reason. I ended up leaving Wikipedia, after that. I then proceed to just start fresh by creating a new account under Checker Fred 2.0 and now realize I shouldn't of done that. I have no relation to any other of simulation12's sock. I only know CaptainDanger25/Bigteddy1 as a user who helps me run the Henry Danger wiki. I admit creating this account was wrong, but I decided I wanted to just move on from the drama that I was in during my days of Checker Fred. Checker Fred 2.0 (talk) 18:40, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even if I hadn't seen the checkuser evidence, I would have said that you're pretty obviously a sock puppet. Talk page access revoked to prevent further time-wasting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.