User talk:Cheezmac6799

Welcome!

Hello, Cheezmac6799, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Nick Cheesewoman, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 18:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nick Cheesewoman

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Nick Cheesewoman, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 18:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nick Cheesewoman

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Nick Cheesewoman, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Asparagusus (interaction) 14:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cheezmac6799 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not used my account for vandalism, I am writing genuine articles about an actual person whom I had met previous to his suprise disapearence. Cheezmac6799 (talk) 16:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This edit was vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 17:14, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cheezmac6799 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Despite the fact that I did nothig wrong, I can see why you may think I did something wrong as the story of Nichael Hermione Cheesewoman is somewhat of an unbelievable one. I accept that you at wikipedia may not believe my article, and for that I apologize. I hope that you may un-ban me so I can write about Nichael's less intense adventures. Cheezmac6799 (talk) 17:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. PhilKnight (talk) 17:14, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TPA revoked. The unblock requests are pure trolling.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]