User talk:Chelomm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possibly unfree File:Enigma NMS.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Enigma NMS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Chelomm/Enigma NMS has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Enigma NMS, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 04:21, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! DoriTalkContribs 04:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! AlexGraal (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dalisays (talk) 06:15, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Enigma NMS[edit]

Hi Excirial

I have written article about Enigma NMS, publishing of which was declined by you on the basis of absence on independent, reputable sources. In references for the article I have included Product Review done by "Network Computing UK Magazine", where they have actually installed and trialed my software. Could you please advise if above reference does not meet Wikipedia's definition of verifiable source. Regarding the way material is presented, I can validate every claim which I made, but it may still look like promotion material. I may need to ask you to point me to whoever can help me to modify my article so it gets published on your web site.

Thank you very much for your assistance

Kind regards

Mikhail Chelomanov NETSAS Pty Ltd Australia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chelomm (talkcontribs) 12:00, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hiyas Mikhail,
The decline i placed on the article was because the article was written as an advertisement, though the notability issue still applies. Par the notability criteria for companies a product is placed in the companies main article, unless individually notable. In that case there must be multiple reliable sources that back up the article. Product reviews on minor websites don't pass these criteria, and thus don't count towards the notability threshold. So before changing anything else in the article, it would be best to accertain that it can pass the notability criteria. Can't pass means no article - thus voiding any extra work.
As for the advertising issue, have a look at (for example)
  • Enigma provides network managers and engineers with wide range of capabilities, which are used to manage and monitor all facets of enterpise network environment, including performance, availability, inventory, configuration, carriage, events, billing. (Advertising)
  • and specialises in innovative and effective enterprise network management (peacock wording)
  • Enigma is a truly enterpise network management solution (Enterprise i guess? Also non neutral wording)
The article isn't as bad in the promotional department as some, but it definitely needs more reliable sources before it will ever to fly.
With kind regards, Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:15, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Enigma NMS[edit]

Hello Chelomm. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Enigma NMS.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Enigma NMS}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 02:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]