Jump to content

User talk:Chiki170

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rashmi Prabhakar (August 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AaqibAnjum were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 14:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Chiki170! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 14:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Double Engine (film) has been accepted

[edit]
Double Engine (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [utc] 13:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takkar (2018 film) (August 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 06:35, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sign

[edit]

(Chiki170 (talk) 19:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Chiki170)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rashmi Prabhakar has been accepted

[edit]
Rashmi Prabhakar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 22:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anusha Rai (actress)

[edit]
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadic chiru (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not getting this article Chiki170 (talk) 18:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anusha Rai (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anusha Rai. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 12:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rashmi Gopinath (November 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KartikeyaS (talk) 20:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMW (film) (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The9Man was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- The9Man (Talk) 09:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Chincholi (November 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Aafī (talk) 14:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anusha Rai (November 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Aafī (talk) 17:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Chincholi (November 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Aafī (talk) 19:31, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anusha (actress) (November 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sdkb was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding block

[edit]

I am not the sockpuppet of any accounts as per my knoedge i have followed the wiki rules Chiki170 (talk) 14:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Req for unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chiki170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i am not the sock puppet of any accounts as per my knowledge i have not violated the wiki policy.. its mentioned as kiran & arifa whom i dont even know actually even they had worked on pages as mentioend but i tried to edit the content i have not used multiple accounts

Decline reason:

Do you really think we unblock people suspected of sockpuppetry just because they tell us they weren't doing it? The question you really want to be asking, and answering, is why it only looks like you were a sockpuppet. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Chiki170 (talk) 14:22, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned That arifa khan is there know he is big froud literally he has cheated few ppl in our circle only and few weeks back have filed complaint also against him.. he accalaimed him as boyfriend of actress anupama parameshwaran he has cheted many peoples i dont have any link with him.. he works on drafts he wil move drafts to main page and ask amount many ppl are cheated Chiki170 (talk) 18:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that arifa history from 2017 i havent done any edits on the pages he has worked how can i be scok puppet of kiran or arifa ? Chiki170 (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reagarding article delete

[edit]

@RoySmith being movie fan we are creating the article but many ppl are trying to delete the article because they have not got what they expected i tried to create the draft 3 times it got deleted Chiki170 (talk) 14:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]