User talk:Child of Albion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello Child of Albion, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay!

Please read The Five Pillars of Wikipedia to help you get to know this place, and you might want to look at What Wikipedia is not to see what is and isn't suitable for Wikipedia.

And remember, don't submit copyrighted work without permission. By submitting your work you promise you wrote it yourself, or copied it from public domain resources — this does not include most web pages.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages or ask a question. Again, welcome! Nfitz 19:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dwarf planet/Naming[edit]

I'm sorry. I've been editing wikipedia for a while but as I use university computers to edit my IP address was being shared with others, so I created an account. I'll happily remove my vote until I've acquired suffiecient edits for my vote to count. How many do I need?Child of Albion 15:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • You don't need any. Ryūlóng suspected that you were a sock puppet based on your lack of edit history. However by doing so, he failed to assume good faith, and didn't consider that you could be an existing user who normally edits just using an IP number, and had decided to create an account to take part in this vote (though voting by IP number is fine too ... but with shared accounts, you can see that can be confusing!). I don't see any reason to suspect anything untoward here, and don't see any reason why you shouldn't vote. Nfitz 19:02, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Cameron visiting hospice.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cameron visiting hospice.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did you take this photo yourself? If so please state that on the description page then we can use it in the article. Thanks Arniep 09:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Cameron image[edit]

Hello, we have to use the image that is availiable under the freeest license possible. If you want a better photo David Cameron's office may agree to license a publicity image of their choice under Creative Commons (without a non commercial or non-modifiable clause) or under GFDL (both these licenses basically mean the image can be used in any commmercial publications without fee as long as it is attributed). Arniep 10:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it is of sufficient quality. You can contact Cameron's office if you want a better one. Arniep 11:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing free images from articles and replacing them with fair use images. This is against Wikipedia policy. Thanks. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ruddy Shelduck[edit]

You must be aware that the "Trevor" bit has been deleted several times - see the history if you are not the anon who kept posting it before. All editors(not just me) have taken the view that this trivia is not appropriate for a scientific article. If you think it is notable, either put it on your university's article, or take it to arbitration. Thanks, jimfbleak 07:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I accept that there needs to be discussion, although it's difficult to see how consensus can be reached on what is essentially an in/out issue. I've commented on the article talk page. jimfbleak 16:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]