User talk:Chimpanzeelover

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Chimpanzeelover, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Chimpanzeelover, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetical order and such[edit]

Whenever you see a list on any Wikipedia article, check to see if it's in alphabetical order (generally by last name) or chornological order, for that matter. If it is, put new entries in the list in that order. Also, any list that has "notable" in its description should only include people of things that have articles on Wikipedia, otherwise we consider them "non-notable". Finally, per WP:V, all facts on Wikipedia are subject to requiring verification by way of a citation from a reliable source. BMK (talk) 01:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hybristophilia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. None of your additions were sourced, and none of their articles had any mention of hybristophilia related activity. I've trimmed all of the unsupported examples (yours and others). Meters (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hybristophilia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Stop doing this. Provide sources or leave them out of the article. Meters (talk) 21:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Hybristophilia . This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop adding unsourced names to this article. Meters (talk) 20:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hybristophilia. Meters (talk) 05:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss E... So Addictive. Rob van vee 09:03, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dirty rap (July 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dirty rap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dirty rap[edit]

Hello, Chimpanzeelover. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Dirty rap".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Thurston High School. Stop making improperly sourced edits. You have had multiple warnings about this and yet I see that you continue to do so. Making a statement in an edit summary is not acceptable sourcing. Wikipedia is never considered a reliable source. Claiming in an edit summary that your source is another Wikipedia article is doubly wrong. Meters (talk) 06:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Thurston High School shooting. One final chance before you get reported. See my comments in the previous warning. Meters (talk) 00:47, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Chimpanzeelover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17697 was submitted on Mar 10, 2017 18:04:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Pass That Dutch. Rob van vee 15:23, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Come Baby Come, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Chimpanzeelover. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism, as you did at Hot Boyz (song). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chimpanzeelover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

No reason given. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Chimpanzeelover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23530 was submitted on Dec 10, 2018 00:56:49. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Chimpanzeelover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23577 was submitted on Dec 14, 2018 00:27:33. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:27, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Love New York (season 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hasta la vista (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Flori4nK. I noticed that in this edit to List of mass shootings in the United States, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flori4nKT A L K 20:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of mass shootings in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of mass shootings in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Jorm (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing

Disruptive edit March 10

Saschaporsche (talk) 08:39, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Another disruptive edit on April 17th; see here. Saschaporsche (talk) 08:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]