User talk:Chipeta100

Simon Cosmas moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Simon Cosmas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Onel5969 thanks for the information. I hope I already fix the issue you can go and review and decide. sorry for the inconvenience. Chipeta100 (talk) 17:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 this person contacted me directly to review. I declined because I don’t think it’s even close to meeting notability. Perhaps you would take a further look and provide a second opinion on my decline. Cheers MaxnaCarta (talk) 12:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chipeta. Thank you for your contributions to WP. I have to agree with MaxnaCarta's assessment he left on his talk page (which I would suggest that MC copy onto the draft as well as a comment for other reviewers to see as well). Right now, there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show they meet notability. His positions on the films are not of the type which generate a lot of press (like a director/producer/cinematographer/screenwriter). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Cosmas (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MaxnaCarta were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Cosmas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MaxnaCarta (talk) 12:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chipeta100! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MaxnaCarta (talk) 12:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sigve Endresen (May 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Can more sources that cover Endresen specifically and extensively be added?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sigve Endresen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, for sure I will add more sources and resubmit again. Chipeta100 (talk) 16:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Cosmas (September 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Fails WP:NFILMMAKER. The references do not help. They are passing mentions or film b.urbs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Cosmas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sigve Endresen[edit]

Hello, Chipeta100. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sigve Endresen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sigve Endresen[edit]

Hello, Chipeta100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sigve Endresen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:50, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Simon Cosmas[edit]

Hello, Chipeta100. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simon Cosmas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]