User talk:ChocolateRabbit/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Although I know you mean well, it has been long-standing convention that the linked NHC advisories constitute sufficient verification of the information. When you revert anything on the grounds of lack of sourcing, you really should consider looking to see if the information added is actually verifiable. If possible, it is far more productive to address the sourcing issue yourself than to revert.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Jasper Deng: Thank you for your clarification. Cheers --MJ500 Fancy a coffee? 03:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of 2017 Créteil mosque incident for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Créteil mosque incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 08:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Farewell Baghdad (2010 film)
Please do not make a revert like this again using automated tools. It's clearly fixing the date format on the article. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)