User talk:ChoudharySamrat

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ChoudharySamrat, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am your mentor and you can ask me any questions on my talk page or check out our help pages if you need help. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Play the The Wikipedia Adventure
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
Remember to cite reliable sources
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Again, welcome! ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 07:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ICFAI University, Tripura section headings[edit]

Please stop using fonts in the section headings. See MOS:HEADINGS. --Bamyers99 (talk) 00:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok ChoudharySamrat (talk) 03:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! ChoudharySamrat, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at ICFAI University, Tripura, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 05:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please dont remove it takes time to add reference ChoudharySamrat (talk) 05:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added all the reliable references to the article. please let me know after if it's ok. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 09:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biplab Halder (October 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biplab Halder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biplab Halder (October 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biplab Halder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:10, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Biplab Halder has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Biplab Halder. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biplab Halder (October 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biplab Halder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biplab Halder (October 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biplab Halder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned all the reliable sources for verifications at references section. kindly suggest ChoudharySamrat (talk) 12:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biplab Halder (October 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biplab Halder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey as per the wikipedia:notability (academics) criteria I have mentioned all the reliable sources which should verify. Please revert back to this if I'm missing something. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 15:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the criteria 6 in that does satisfies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) ChoudharySamrat (talk) 15:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biplab Halder (October 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Biplab Halder (October 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Biplab Halder, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Biplab Halder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 22:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Biplab Halder (October 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Biplab Halder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, ChoudharySamrat. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Biplab Halder, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not remove the conflict of interest tags. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 09:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sure ChoudharySamrat (talk) 09:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in ICARIA (event), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 09:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to ICARIA (event), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 10:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the content does not looks like an advertisement kindly check before reverting ChoudharySamrat (talk) 10:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"recognized for its ongoing evolution into a significant and dynamic event within North-Eastern India" is absolutely nothing but blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 11:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yeah thanks for replying updated that. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 11:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why did you nominated the page for deletion without reviewing Theroadislong that's relentless and detestation, while I'm trying to improve the article actively. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 11:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:ICARIA_(event). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 11:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, my intention is not to do any personal attacks. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

kindly give a warning before doing all of a sudden nomination ChoudharySamrat (talk) 12:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ICARIA (event)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ICARIA (event), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how come you are nominating the article for deletion when I'm actively editing and improving the article, it seems you are projecting your anger. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 11:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Icaria (event)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Icaria (event), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 11:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

seriously all of a sudden please check before nominating for deletion ChoudharySamrat (talk) 11:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This has been checked, multiple times and deleted. Please do not submit the same article over and over. It creates work for nothing. You are welcome to submit the draft for review, but it would require substantial sourcing as explained above and below. Oaktree b (talk) 14:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 11:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be honest.[edit]

Have you been paid by ICARIA to promote their festival on Wikipedia, under multiple page names? LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 12:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to create a neutral point of view of the article but all of a sudden the page is being nominated for deletion which is was not happening earlier while I am actively improving the page and taking help from the libera chat there are editors who are helping they did say some points looks promotional which I'm updating and also you have suddenly prompted to nomination while you are not doing that in earlier case. The person who nominated I asked his help in earlier in the talk page of him but no response was there for almost a month and now all of a sudden that person seems triggered while I said yeah thanks I have updated the sentence which he mentioned the sentence is blatantly written.

when asked for help no response but for rejecting doing quickly that's relentless. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 12:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer my question. Were you paid by a third party, such as the ICARIA festival, to write this article? LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 12:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a paid editor you need to use the WP:AFC process. Theroadislong (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok I will ChoudharySamrat (talk) 13:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

already disclosed please do check. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 12:59, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Icaria (fest) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Icaria (fest) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icaria (fest) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 12:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ani notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 13:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 18:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating the same deleted promotional article several times under different names is extremely disruptive. See this ANI discussion. Bishonen | tålk 18:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC).[reply]
I have given the reason that my intention is not to promote I myself proposed the deletion the previous two and trying to create a neutral point of view article.

And Why ICFAI University Page has been nominated all of a sudden when I have mentioned and I have also mailed legal@wikimedia.org when creating the article. kindly revert the nomination of deletion of ICFAI University Tripura ChoudharySamrat (talk) 03:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChoudharySamrat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do understand we have to create or edit article in a neutral point of view. I kindly request I will not make mistake again and not write about ICARIA fest again, I promise that. Kindly unblock my account ChoudharySamrat (talk) 04:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Also what do you mean by "we"? Aoidh (talk) 04:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ChoudharySamrat (talk) 04:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChoudharySamrat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator,

I am writing this to request an unblock of my account on Wikipedia and the reason of getting blocked was due my creation of ICARIA festival which was deleted multiple times and created again with similar content which may have caused disruptive behavior according to Wikipedia guidelines we should not promote or adversite anything it should be in a neutral point of view and in depth point of view with proper reliable citation. I apologize for the inconvenience and damage which may have been caused. I promised not to write about ICARIA festival again and should be strictly adhere to Wikipedia guidelines. I kindly request you to consider and give me another chance.

ChoudharySamrat (talk) 05:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Superseded by the below request. 331dot (talk) 07:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As a note, you should not be using ChatGPT or similar chatbots to generate the text of unblock requests. I highly suggest you rewrite this using your own words. - Aoidh (talk) 05:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChoudharySamrat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator, I am writing this to request an unblock of my account on Wikipedia and the reason of getting blocked was due my creation of ICARIA festival which was deleted multiple times and created again with similar content which may have caused disruptive behavior according to Wikipedia guidelines we should not promote or adversite anything it should be in a neutral point of view and in depth point of view with proper reliable citation. I apologize for the inconvenience and damage which may have been caused. I promised not to write about ICARIA festival again and should be strictly adhere to Wikipedia guidelines. I kindly request you to consider and give me another chance. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 05:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm unwilling to unblock you to continue to, at this time, make COI related edits. We're going to want to see some edits in other areas for a time, to demonstrate your understanding of relevant policies, before we permit you to edit about the topics for which you have a conflict of interest. If that's okay with you, please tell what topics you intend to edit about in a new request. I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You said you emailed WMF Legal, why? 331dot (talk) 07:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleary mentioned why I emailed WMF Legal at the above response.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ChoudharySamrat (talk • contribs)

Then I guess I'm missing it because I don't see an explanation. Can you please say it again? 331dot (talk) 08:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

when I have started editing the article I have mailed all the media files which have been used is under the authority of University so there should not be any copyright issue when using it at WMF Legal email address.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ChoudharySamrat (talk • contribs)

Please sign your posts with four tildes(~~~~) so we know you wrote them(if you aren't using a keyboard, a button on the screen can also provide them, the button looks like a scribble). That's not typically how that's done(see WP:DCP); usually Legal is only contacted if someone intends to take a legal action against Wikipedia. I was asking in case you had a legal action underway against Wikipedia- if you don't, okay. What edits do you intend to make? 331dot (talk) 08:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping it's difficult to reply through edit source. I want to apologize for the damage or inconvenience may have caused, I promised to not do mistakes like this again. I have also asked admin or expert editors for help and reviewing the article for but there is rarely a response. And I want to clear out that there is no intentional to damage or violate the Wikipedia guidelines. But I have surely learned my lesson.--ChoudharySamrat (talk) 08:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; as I asked, what edits do you intend to make? 331dot (talk) 09:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to improve the article and rectify the page where it looks promotional. It will also be helpful if you suggest which should be rectified or removed so, atleast it should be properly cited and in neutral point of view at ICFAI University, Tripura page. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 09:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ready to edit topics on biography or geographical location ChoudharySamrat (talk) 09:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I created new request as asked by 331dot for what edits do I intend to make but got I do not know how it got declined? ChoudharySamrat (talk) 09:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

331dot I do not get it I created the new request as you said and told the topics I intend to edit for demonstration of understanding of relevant policies. But the request got declined by someone else? ChoudharySamrat (talk) 09:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say that just telling us what you wanted to edit would be sufficient to unblock you. Yamla was completely correct. 331dot (talk) 12:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"before we permit you to edit about the topics for which you have a conflict of interest. If that's okay with you, please tell what topics you intend to edit about in a new request. I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 3 November 2023".

I answered the question what topics I intent to edit. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 12:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"An editor has nominated this article for deletion.

You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.

Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion."

please suggest how would I improve when I'm blocked? ChoudharySamrat (talk) 12:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can't, that's the whole point of being blocked. Now that you are socking you have made this worse for yourself. 331dot (talk) 08:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it's ok. thank you for your time. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 09:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChoudharySamrat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I intend to make edits on the topics of biography or geographical location ChoudharySamrat (talk) 10:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Same as the below request. Either you come up with some more compelling reasons we should unblock you on the next request (assuming you make one) or I strongly recommend to that reviewing admin that your talk page access be revoked. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do as you wish. Thanks--ChoudharySamrat (talk) 07:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChoudharySamrat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm ready to edit topics on living person biography or geographical location

Decline reason:

No thanks. Yamla (talk) 09:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was asked to tell if I'm okay with the above requirements by 331dot then mention the topics which I intend to edit in a new request--ChoudharySamrat (talk) 10:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin note: USer has socked as KujoJoske (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChoudharySamrat. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Techno Cultural Event in Tripura[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Techno Cultural Event in Tripura indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

I oppose this editor being unblocked. This editor made a concerted effort to bypass Wikipedia controls by gaming the system to promote their festival on multiple occasions. He was wholly disruptive with no benefit to Wikipedia. scope_creep^Talk 07:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize if any damage was caused, it was not my intention to cause disruption ChoudharySamrat (talk) 09:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Biplab Halder[edit]

Hello, ChoudharySamrat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Biplab Halder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Biplab Halder[edit]

Hello, ChoudharySamrat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Biplab Halder".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]