User talk:Chri862z

Your username[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Peter Capak, and I noticed that your username, "TransientDAWN", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Greyjoy^talk 11:32, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Greyjoy. I don't believe that my username violates any policies, since both parts (transient and dawn) are expressions of my own academic interests. I am a physicist who deals primarily with high energy transients and the Cosmic Dawn, the latter of which is also used as part of the naming of a center I happen to be very interested in because it overlaps with my own research. However, I don't believe that the term DAWN is exclusive because it is also used by a research center where I am not an employee. If this is still deemed a problem I am happy to change it!

TransientDAWN, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi TransientDAWN! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Cosmic Dawn Center moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Cosmic Dawn Center, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Chri862z. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Chri862z. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
(When editing existing articles: ) propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
(When creating a new article: ) create a draft using the Article Wizard, at Wikipedia:Article_wizard/Referencing;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Logo for DAWN with blue horizon.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for DAWN with blue horizon.jpg, which you've attributed to dawn.nbi.ku.dk. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone[edit]

First of all, I apologize for not answering before now, I really really appreciate the constructive criticisms and the support for getting started. As per request with the username, it has now been changed. I understand why a COI seemed probable, but I am simply a student at the University of Copenhagen who is very interested in astronomy and an admirer of the work done at the cosmic dawn center, which I think is really important. I've worked hard on improving the cosmic dawn center article, both adding secondary and tertiary references as much as possible and rewriting it in a more neutral language. I hope that it is all good to go now! Again, thank you for helping me managing how to contribute to wikipedia in the best way.

AfC notification: Draft:Cosmic Dawn Center has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cosmic Dawn Center. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 21:39, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cosmic Dawn Center has been accepted[edit]

Cosmic Dawn Center, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Charles Steinhardt[edit]

Hi there! Could you specify which part of WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:PROF this article meets? If it doesn't meet any of them, I'm not sure the subject of this article merits an entry in Wikipedia quite yet. Sam-2727 (talk) 15:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for reviewing the article. I will definitely get around to it this week but I'm going to be very occupied for the first bit? I am convinced that the article definitely deserves a spot since Prof. Steinhardt is gaining significant attention these days but I'll have to find the back-up material later. Chri862z (talk) 9:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Charles Steinhardt for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Steinhardt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Steinhardt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam-2727 (talk) 05:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cosmic Dawn Center for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cosmic Dawn Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic Dawn Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam-2727 (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Charles steinhardt[edit]

Hello, Chri862z. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Charles steinhardt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 17:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charles steinhardt[edit]

Hello, Chri862z. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charles steinhardt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]