User talk:Chris the Wiss

Persistance[edit]

Why are you so persistant? Doing this will just make people dislike you more.. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:53, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All i want is to edit constructively, i tried reasoning with you all but you just won't listen (PS see the bottom of your talk page). Chris the Wiss 19:00, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok look, I know I have been less tolerant of you than others have, and I would hate for you to dislike me more because of that, but you need to understand you are giving noone any reason to change their views and/or attitudes towards yourself and this fiasco. It's evident (at least to me) that you have some form of good intentions for constructive editing (which is probably why some have been more tolerate of your behaviour), but on the other hand, you have made content edits completely unconstructive and at times damaging and destructive, and to add to that, you have insulted several editors (including myself) beyond excuse. The more socks you play around with, and the more insults you dish out, and indeed the more you say you have changed and go against your own promise, then the longer I think it'll take anyone to even contemplate giving you anymore chances; it would be in everyone's interest (very much your own mainly), to step back for a period of time and let the dust settle before considering doing anything else. But please, take this merely as advice rather than a harsh warning (not that you'll listen to either, mind). Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account is editing in violation of the sockpuppetry policy, and has been blocked indefinitely. If you want to get a clean start under a new name, you must adhere to the guidelines for multiple accounts; specifically, in this case, refrain from making the same (or similar) contentious edits as you have with previous accounts. Find a different subject to interest yourself in, or don't bother coming back. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 20:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chris the Wiss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE Tiptoety I KNOW WHAT I'VE DONE WRONG BUT CAN YOU FIND IT IN YOUR HEART TO GIVE ME ONE MORE CHANCE PLEASE!

Decline reason:

In this edit, you promised not to use socks any more. But here you are with another sockpuppet. Wikipedia does indeed give 'one more chance,' but third and fourth chances are not as easily had. I think you've used up your chances. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

~~I'd be willing to unblock you if you agree not to make any edits related to any aspect of Coronation Street. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 17:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

I wasn't aware of your long history. No way this block gets lifted. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 19:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chris the Wiss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PLEASE THOUGH, I ONLY USED SOCKS BECAUSE I WANT TO EDIT, THIS TIME I WON'T USE ANY MORE, EVIN IF THIS IS DECLINED

Decline reason:

If you would like to edit, please request an unblock from your first blocked account, or contact the Arbitration Committee. You may not create new accounts to bypass an existing block. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 18:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chris the Wiss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'VE SAID THIS MANY TIMES - I CAN'T USE MY PRIMARY ACCOUNT AS THE TALK PAGE IS PROTECTED; SEE HERE

Decline reason:

Then contact the arbitration committee directly. Information for doing so is located on their page. That is your only recourse left if you wish to edit. You may want to assume a less adversarial role when doing so, typing in all caps and otherwise acting bullish is unlikely to convince others to give you more chances to edit. Please do not make further unblock requests on this talk page. You will not be unblocked, and this talk page will be protected as well. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 18:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.