User talk:Christianrxx

The Born This Way Bour Tour

Hong Kong is Hong Kong, China is China! Please seperate two places. According to the information from Lady Gaga Facebook Webpage, it is written "Hong Kong" only, not "Hong Kong, China".

Hong Kong is a CITY within the COUNTRY of China. On her facebook page only the cities are shown, but on her official website its listed as "Hong Kong, China" and thats how it should be listed on the Born This Way Ball page. --Christianrxx (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Christianrxx[reply]

Hong Kong is the special administrative region of China. Hong Kong has its own government, usually Hong Kong seperated with China as you can find it in youtube, google such big website. If you write China, it refers to Mainland China but Hong Kong is Hong Kong, China. If you write Hong Kong, they will know Hong Kong is a part of China already. --Ckheakcley (talk) 20:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Ckheakcley According to your logic, Taiwan should also not be a country. According to your logic, Taiwan is also part of China. --Ckheakcley (talk) 17:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Ckheakcley[reply]

The format should be how its listed on Gaga's official website. Stop saying hong kong is a country but it ISN'T, it is widely known as a city. It even says on the wikipedia page for hong kong that its a CITY-STATE --Christianrxx (talk) 19:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Christianrxx[reply]

I didn't say Hong Kong is a country, it is a region. If you say Hong Kong is belonged to China, then you should also changed Taipei to China! Otherwise, it is unfair to Hong Kongers. It also known that Hong Kong is a special region, not controlled by the Chinese government and we have our OWN government. I also refered to Lady Gaga facebook page. --Ckheakcley (talk) 19:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Ckheakcley[reply]

Lady Gaga discography

I've had to remove all of your edits to the discography article. Your first edits changed all the certifications to match sales figures. It's a common mistake to make, but the certifications are not automatic, and we can't list a certification until the certifying agency issues it.

This edit is a bigger problem: the source clearly says 108,000. You changed the figure to say 438,000. Why? I know you know how to change sources, so if you had a new source, you knew how to change it to match.—Kww(talk) 04:18, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Lady Gaga discography do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Lady Gaga discography. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:45, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Monster (Lady Gaga song) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sales of Born This Way

Hi! You should at least give a good reason for deleting the verifiability tag[1] if you think Gaga's manager is a reliable source to say how much the album has sold. Please join the discussion.[2] Thank you. -- Frous (talk) 00:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Born This Way. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Calabe 1992 00:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gaga-full.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gaga-full.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Gaga in studio.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Gaga in studio.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 67.252.178.201 (talk) 03:49, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:04, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Fame Monster

Almost every country counted the version TF + TFM with The Fame sales, not The Fame Monster EP. On Mediatraffic when TFM was released they stop counting TF sales and made it The Fame(Monster), The Fame Monster EP counted as a different album. Just tell me how you explain The Fame sales before TFM release were around 6 million and now are around 14 million?. That is because they counted TFM Deluxe together with The Fame. This is from The Fame page, this means The Fame and The Fame monster deluxe counted together: "With the release of The Fame Monster, which was also combined with The Fame as a deluxe edition, the album jumped from thirty-four to six on the Billboard 200 with sales of 151,000.[47] On the issue dated January 16, 2010, The Fame moved to a new peak of two on the Billboard 200 after being on the charts for sixty-two weeks" --Albes29 (talk) 19:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In this article is clear that sales from TFM Deluxe counts together with The Fame: http://music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart-watch/week-ending-nov-29-2009-women-take-charge.html

The article from ContactMusic states The Fame Monster sold 6 million copies. I know it wasn't released as an EP worldwide, but it was released as an EP in: United States, Germany, Canada, Columbia, France, Australia, Chile and China. Those are 8 huge countries, it would make sense that the sales of the standard addition add up to 6 million copies - Christianrxx

The ContactMusic states The Fame Monster because after the The Fame Monster release the album The Fama was called The Fame Monster too. TFM EP sold 1.5 million in US, 177K in France, 210K in Australia, in Germany it charted together with TF, we don't have data for China, Chile and Colombia are not big markets, in Japan was also released as EP and it sold a bit more than 500K. In total that makes less than 2.4 million, very far from 6 million. There is not more big markets selling TFM EP alone, that is why 6 million is just impossible. Sorry for my english, I hope you understand what I mean. --Albes29 (talk) 10:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So you think the 6 million copies should not be included on her discography page because the wikipedia article The Fame Monster only talks about the EP itself? - Christianrxx

You can add those sales on her discography page saying that in 2010 she sold 10 million almbums but you can add it on The Fame Monster EP sales. Part of those 6 million sold are already included on The Fame sales like I already explain you. As long as we don't get official sales for the EP alone we can't add sales to Gaga's discography page. The Fame Monster sales situation is very complicated but for now we can't do anything else.--Albes29 (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to List of awards and nominations received by Lady Gaga. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:42, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Lady Gaga discography, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 05:25, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Marry the Night. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How is it not sourced? The link proves it, see - http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100#/song/lady-gaga/marry-the-night/25476956

And the same link was already provided in the Marry the Night article.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your improvement over the Lady Gaga articles. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

Hey buddy! Have you heard back from legolas about adding electro-rock into the genres for Born This Way?--Jakeriederer (talk) 19:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, and no I haven't. It needs to be done though. --Christianrxx (talk) 02:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Christianrxx[reply]

I agree 100% , while electronic is too broad of a change, replacing it with synthpop is too narrow, it doesnt account for even 50% of the album, electro-rock is really present on almost every song! I just really hope it goes through..--Jakeriederer (talk) 21:45, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Same, I hope so too! --Christianrxx (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Christianrxx[reply]

Heyy Jakeriederer! So, Legolas is taking forever to answer me on the Born This Way talk page about adding electro-rock to the genre section of the infobox. It's kinda annoying lol. I just wish we could get this done and over with! I know you agree --Christianrxx (talk) 21:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Christianrxx[reply]

Heey :)! Yeah I know LOL I gave up and added it, he already said we could so I went ahead! But anyways were having quite an interesting discussion on her new album on his talk page, you should def join in!--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 05:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Name

Oh yeah totally forgot to tell you! I changed my name from Jakeriederer to (CA)Giacobbe, cause I'm from Canada, and my name in Italian is Giacobee, just a heads up so you don't get confused!--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 05:15, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Gaga edit

Hello, You reverted my revert of your original edit yesterday, although your changes such as New York City, New York, U.S. is commonly referred to New York, New York as well as 'not withstanding' is referred to notwithstanding in proper grammar. I am aware that your edit was not vandalism, although it replaced Marry The Night with You and I, which was un-sourced. I'm sorry for this confusion. --GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 23:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok, however Marry the Night does not qualify as a chart-topping single. It's Gaga's lowest charting song - You and I has done much better on the charts. --Christianrxx (talk) 23:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Christianrxx[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Born This Way, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speechless

Christian get a load of this! Remember when I read the Speechless (Lady Gaga song), I saw that pop rock was the genre, but different genres were listed in the composition, so I checked them all out, and found pop rock no where! So I changed it, then you changed one of the genres (which is completely understandable seeing is how it was only INFLUENCED by country). But anyways, some editor comes along and changes it back to pop rock, and we got in this big was, TURNS OUT HE DIDNT EVEN READ THE SOURCES LMFAAAOOOOOO! Can you believe that shit!--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 01:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The editors think they're always right but they're not... I hate that shit lol --Christianrxx (talk) 01:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Christianrxx[reply]

Under-appreciated editors unite LOL! But tell me about it, they think they're so high and mighty, like honestly bro I swear half of them don't even bother reading the god damn article...--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 01:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to You and I (Lady Gaga song), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Proper third-party sources are required for genres. First-party sources (in this case, the artist) are not acceptable. –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]