User talk:Chuck369

This user may have left Wikipedia. Chuck369 has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Chuck369}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Notes and References[edit]

List of ISO 639-1 codes
List of Wikipedias
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Virginia
Potomac_News
New_contributors'_help_page
Wikipedia:First_steps
Cheat Sheet
Glossary
Reference desk
Wikipedia:Portal/Directory
Wikipedia:WARN

look at media general aritcle and template, Consider future schools in Prince_William_County_Public_Schools Fix Virginia Employment Commission

Proposed deletion of Gainesville Middle School[edit]

The article Gainesville Middle School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable middle school

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 02:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pwc soe ref[edit]

A tag has been placed on Pwc soe ref requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Chuck369 (talk) 17:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patriot High[edit]

I guess you can if you think it should be removed. I just added it because it already has a page created. It's up to you though. Trunks719 (talk) 03:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are u thinking about deleting the page for Patriot High School also? Trunks719 (talk) 03:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gainesville Middle School[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Gainesville Middle School. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gainesville Middle School. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Williams[edit]

Hi Chuck, You were right. I own the original Acetate recording that Warren made to launch his career in 1959. In fact I have it listed on eBay at the moment. In researching this item, I have accumulated sufficient information to include it on Wikipedia. So thanks, and I'll post you a copy before I put it up to get have the benefit of your experienced eyes and hopefully some good criticism. Cheers, 143.238.104.4 (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have started an article for him. See Warren Williams (rock musician) --Chuck369 (talk) 17:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

West Virginia Community Colleges template[edit]

Pardon me for being a bit terse, but I don't see the point of Template:West Virginia Community Colleges. You've taken a simple navbox used in only a handful of places and made it rather complex with little benefit as far as I can tell. What exactly are you planning? Brian Powell (talk) 05:14, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brian, I just have not made all the changes yet. I made the list of schools a template because the list is used in several other articles, including List_of_community_colleges#West_Virginia, West_Virginia#Education, and West_Virginia#Colleges_and_universities. --Chuck³⁶⁹ (talk) 14:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck, the template makes it much harder to maintain the content and locks editors in to a particular formatting style due to its complexity. It's not as if this content is being used in that many places and including main article content (as opposed to navbox elements and the like) is definitely non-typical usage. I think it would be much better to just leave things as they were. The template is a neat programming trick but will just be a headache in the long run. Brian Powell (talk) 14:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will remove the change. --Chuck³⁶⁹ (talk) 14:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Brian Powell (talk) 16:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Samantha Sang[edit]

FYI. Samantha Sang has always said for "media" reasons her DOB is 1953. In fact it is positively 1951. Tinkerme2 (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tinkerme2, I have not been able to verify your statement. Can you provide a reliable source? Also, from Wikipedia:Verifiability,

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—what counts is whether readers can verify that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source..., not whether editors think it is true.

--Chuck³⁶⁹ (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shadow Mirror (novel)[edit]

The article Shadow Mirror (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable per WP:BK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:03, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Godwin Middle School[edit]

The article Godwin Middle School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Middle schools not presumed notable by WP:SCH, special notability not indicated

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MadCow257 (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beville Middle School[edit]

The article Beville Middle School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Middle schools not presumed notable by WP:SCH, county excellence award is not in itself notable enough

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MadCow257 (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benton Middle School (Prince William County, Virginia)[edit]

The article Benton Middle School (Prince William County, Virginia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Middle schools not presumed notable by WP:SCH, county excellence award is not in itself notable enough

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MadCow257 (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.[edit]

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis [1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=28519624 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 13:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pwc soe[edit]

Template:Pwc soe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pwc soe ref[edit]

Template:Pwc soe ref has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]