User talk:Cianmarbo

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cianmarbo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:18, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Treaty with North Korea[edit]

Dear Cianmarbo I have moved the article Peace Treaty with North Korea into drafts, at Draft:Peace Treaty with North Korea, since theres so many issues reg the article, including its title, where you can continue to develop the article according to Wikipedis recommendations, and try to find consensus with other users on the talk page, should there be different opinions. Dan Koehl (talk) 22:22, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peace Treaty with North Korea[edit]

Another editor user:Mbernste moved it back, and now:

The article Peace Treaty with North Korea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article appears to imply that there has been a diplomatic attempt to have a "Peace Treaty" with North Korea, when this has in fact not happened. It is also written in a poor standard of english and does not provide any proof or evidence, merely stating "Peace Treaty with North Korea is a peace agreement with North Korea will be an agreement to end the war officially on the Korean Peninsula as a follow-up to the 1953 Armistice Agreement, which was intervened by the United Nations after the Korean War." The article seems to be based on ones own personal view that current geopolitical events could eventually lead to a peace agreement, however, there is very little, if any evidence to support that this has been proposed at any diplomatic level as of yet. While I would like if such a peace treaty was agreed upon, this article contains fictional information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 14:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

your disruptive reverts. The material you keep putting back belongs to a different section. Besides, the article is not supposed to aggregate the news stream. Pls if you have any suggestions/objections, discuss on the TalkPage of the article. Otherwise, I will have to report your behavior on ANI.Axxxion (talk) 16:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apropos your suggestions, Please put them on the Talk page: Talk:2017 North Korea crisis.Axxxion (talk) 16:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That said, your written English competence is obviously deficient in some aspects. I am writing this not to deter you from contributing but to warn you that articles here cannot be written in the kind of ″english″ that is usually employed in Asian countries on their governments′ news agencies′ websites (essentially, machine-made translations from an indigenous lingo). And the fact that you apparently fail to know the difference between ″it′s″ and ″its″ ([1]), you obviously have some to go.Axxxion (talk) 17:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]