User talk:Ciarafan247

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2008 (U.S.), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2008 (U.S.) was changed by Ciarafan247 (u) (t) deleting 10368 characters on 2009-02-07T21:34:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hot 100 lists[edit]

Hello. I realize you're doing a lot of work, but you are substantially changing the structure of these articles. List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2008 (U.S.), in particular, was a featured list. Removing all the references and almost all the text may not be viewed as an improvement. I would suggest holding off on further articles until other editors express an opinion, because I think there will be some who want to undo all your work. Gimmetrow 23:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2007 (U.S.). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 00:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2008 (U.S.), you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 00:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2009 (U.S.). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 00:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing privileges have been suspended indefinitely[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

I suggest that you (re)acquaint yourself with the Wikipedia ethos of consensus. While WP:BOLD is encouraged, there is also the concept of WP:BRD. By ignoring requests to explain yourself and to stop and gain consensus for your changes I have been left with no choice but to block the account. Should you request unblocking, I strongly suggest that you undertake to discuss your proposed changes on the article talkpage first and to only act where there is agreement. LessHeard vanU (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

not a sockpuppet of Billhits[edit]

That is just a fact.Garynine (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]