User talk:Cinagroni

Welcome![edit]

Hi Cinagroni! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Sorry[edit]

I want to say that I am sincerely sorry for how I acted yesterday. I will try to learn my lesson and keep out of such discussions in future because it clearly has a very negative effect on my mental health. We can agree to disagree on grammar. I do not wish to continue such discussions further. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 15:06, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI thread[edit]

Hi, thanks for raising the minor edits issue at ANI. Just letting you know I've closed this thread with a reminder to Pajfarmor to review the guidelines at WP:MINOR and, going forward, to not mark substantive changes as minor. The close message is here.

Hopefully this will resolve the issue, but if it continues please let me know at my talkpage. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot imagine why you are bending over backwards to play this issue down, and to be as friendly as possible to the person dishonestly marking their edits as minor. A few days before I reported them, someone reported a different user for exactly the same problem: [1]. Their behaviour was described as "deceptive and disruptive editing. And yet nobody criticised the person applying that description, and the user concerned was blocked for disruption.

Given that the user I reported has been editing since 2006, it is not plausible that they are marking their edits as minor by accident somehow, or without understanding what minor edits are. If they were leaving edit summaries, then marking as minor would be almost irrelevant, but that is not the case. In 14 years, they have never responded even a single time to a message left on their talk page, so they are not going to confirm that they have read or comprehended your message to them, but you basically told them not to worry about it anyway. Cinagroni (talk) 12:18, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Euryalus, it should come as no surprise that the user has continued to mark significant edits as minor, without leaving an edit summary either. [2], [3]. It is obviously intentionally disruptive. Cinagroni (talk) 16:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Euryalus, I see that you asked the user to stop marking major edits as minor. Again, no surprise to see that they continued doing so soon afterwards. If you doubted before that they were being deliberately disruptive, maybe it is clearer now. Cinagroni (talk) 13:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cinagroni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse." I do not understand this. My account certainly has not been used abusively, and certainly will not ever be. Can you identify any edits I have made which you believe to be harmful? Cinagroni (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified LTA. 331dot (talk) 23:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cinagroni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is not correct. This account has not ever been used abusively, nor ever would be. If you think any edit I made was intended to be harmful, point it out. Cinagroni (talk) 13:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.