User talk:CinemaKnight100

Thanks fo your contribution to the Indiana districts. Perhaps you could use a simpler format like the table I made in Indiana's 3rd congressional district? —GoldRingChip 15:14, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Clarence Avant.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Clarence Avant.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Clarence Avant.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Clarence Avant.jpeg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alfonso III of Asturias

Hello and thank you for your edits to Alfonso III of Asturias. However, when you did your edit, you added pseudo-footnote numbers like "[6]", but you didn't add the actual citations. Please see Help:Footnotes on how to properly add them to an article. Thank you. —howcheng {chat} 19:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Daytona Beach Police Department Insignia.png

Thanks for uploading File:Daytona Beach Police Department Insignia.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:30, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Eathorne (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission has been declined for one or more of the following reasons:

It is primarily designed to threaten, disparage or attack its subject.
It is a biography of a living person that is unreferenced and entirely negative in tone.
It is a page that is purely vandalistic in nature.

This page meets one or more of the general criteria for speedy deletion and may be deleted without notice. Users who continue to create inappropriate pages will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is quite a lot of unreferenced content there, which is particularly problematic in an article on a living person. Also, some of the statements are bordering on attacks, and need to be either removed or supported very well by citing reliable and independent published sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Eathorne and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article, even if doesn't pass muster. I initiated it with the idea that Eathorne's involvement in Jan. 6th and campaigning against Liz Cheney was notable, though I'm curious to know 1. if you would consider that notable enough and 2. are there any specific sections that could be improved and/or expanded to be more fair? If not, I am happy to let it go, but if yes, I would be very grateful for any assistance in making it better. CinemaKnight100 (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CinemaKnight100! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

California's 11th congressional district

added a link pointing to CA-12

California's 14th congressional district

added a link pointing to CA-12

California's 30th congressional district

added a link pointing to CA-36

Indiana's 1st congressional district

added a link pointing to Clinton Township, Indiana

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Illinois's 2nd congressional district

added links pointing to IL-1, IL-15 and IL-16

California's 30th congressional district

added a link pointing to CA-36

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Wisconsin's 3rd congressional district

added a link pointing to Friendship, Wisconsin

Wisconsin's 7th congressional district

added a link pointing to Florence, Wisconsin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Frank Eathorne

Hello, CinemaKnight100. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frank Eathorne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Frank Eathorne

Hello, CinemaKnight100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frank Eathorne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Mikeblas (talk) 00:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]