User talk:Clarkus22

This is Clarkus22's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Porcellio hoffmannseggii has been accepted[edit]

Porcellio hoffmannseggii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Merulanella has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Merulanella. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Updated based on your comment! Clarkus22 (talk) 20:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P. hoffmannseggii in the pet trade[edit]

Dear Clarkus, Congratulations for you first article! Do you perhaps have any sources for the "In the pet trade" section of that article? Felix QW (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is difficult to find academic sources on the pet trade components; there is a lot of activity on various stores but not many formal studies on the pet trade specifically. I am looking at a few articles that represent the best we currently have; there are groups and vendors with a good reputation within the hobby that have some articles and blog posts that are possibly an alternative. Clarkus22 (talk) 20:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I realise that finding reliable sources for some hobbies can be difficult; before I flagged the section, I tried to verify the information using Google, but didn't get anywhere, even though plenty of vendor sites are selling these animals and also stating much the same claims. Is there maybe a good old-fashioned pet hobbyist's magazine that could have run articles on this sort of topic? Felix QW (talk) 21:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The magazine is a good idea, I'll dig around Clarkus22 (talk) 22:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merulanella has been accepted[edit]

Merulanella, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Atypical traits and behavior in specific Isopod species[edit]

Hello, Clarkus22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atypical traits and behavior in specific Isopod species, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Atypical traits and behavior in specific Isopod species[edit]

Hello, Clarkus22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Atypical traits and behavior in specific Isopod species".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]