User talk:Clash Jester

Contact me anytime you want.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikola Tavares (June 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikola Tavares and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikola Tavares, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, A player of Burnley Football club! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jay Rodriguez, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nick Pope (footballer). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User name[edit]

Hi there, just a quick note to say that if you genuinely are a Burnley player, you should refrain from editing articles relating to the club or its players, based on WP:COI. If you are not really a Burnley player, please consider changing your user name per WP:MISLEADNAME -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also if you are genuinely a Burnley player wanting to remain anonymous, you may want to remove the "My Career" section on your userpage, because otherwise people may be able to work out who you are. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with the above, a simple Google search confirms who you might be (I'm not going to WP:OUT you in case I am wrong) but if you are who you claim to be, I would also strongly advise you to remove it and WP:RENAME your username as the club won't be happy if the media get hold of it. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:51, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't try to fool me. A simple Wikipedia account will never attract media. But still I'll remove 'my career' section.A player of Burnley Football club (talk) 10:09, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to help you here for your own good. And as for that statement about the media, don't be so sure they won't be interested. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikola Tavares (July 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JMHamo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NFOOTY, has not made his first-team debut yet

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikola Tavares and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikola Tavares, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JMHamo (talk) 16:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, A player of Burnley Football club, does not meet our username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have selected a new username that meets the username policy guidelines, which are summarized below.

Per the username policy, a username should represent an individual and should not: represent a group or organization; be promotional; be misleading (such as indicating possession of special user rights or being a ”Bot" account (unless approved for such purposes)); be offensive or otherwise disruptive. However, a username that contains the name of a organization and also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or “FoobarFan87" is allowed, though, among others, the guidance on conflict of interest and the policy of paid-contribution disclosure are relevant.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice,. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Clash Jester (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My name is changed. Please unblock me.Clash Jester (talk) 05:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

renamed --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

rename not successful[edit]

The chosen username is too similar to existing usernames or it used to be username of someone else that got renamed: A-Player, APlayer and Aplayer. Please choose again --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joy globally renamed A player of Burnley Football club to Clash Jester[edit]

globally renamed A player of Burnley Football club to Clash Jester. Sorry for the aggravation. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trying real hard to do that[edit]

but the constant edit conflicts make it difficult. --Deepfriedokra (talk)

email[edit]

Please stop emailing me --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC) OKClash Jester (talk) 13:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Aung San Suu Kyi. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

😪 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC) My god! Such a warning on a such a small acquitance! Of course I accidently read wrong😫. I'll not repeat such mistake😁.Clash Jester (talk) 13:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Funny" redirects[edit]

Please stop creating inappropriate redirects, that you think are funny. It will lead to your block from editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Giant Snowman 16:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing[edit]

You have been blocked for WP:NOTHERE, for an indefinite time. There was a discussion here [1]. See WP:GAB. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:15, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clash Jester (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have never tried to hurt anyone's sentiments through my edits. I spend my free time in Wikipedia. Even after lunch,rests,sleep etc.,there is plenty of time to create redirects which is quite easy. My name is also changed,so it is not affecting WP:COI. My edits are also never disruptive. You'll clearly see there is nothing wrong in my edits. Those 'funny redirects' are actually nicknames of those personalities. There are many,many redirects which are nicknames of the personalities. You may check google for verifacation. Also my boss Sean Dyche himself calls him 'The Boring One'. Check google for verifying. I am not any imposter. There is no guideline in Wikipedia that imposters are forbidden to edit even if he/she made good edits. But I have also never made any edit coincidencing with my name. You should see my edits,not who made them. So I think they are some of the good reasons I should be unblocked. Thank you.Clash Jester (talk) 02:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Community consensus was unambiguous. Your edits were inappropriate and disruptive. Either deliberate trolling or sheer incompetence. This unblock request suggests but does not confirm the latter. Regardless, the block is clearly necessary. Yamla (talk) 10:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Nikola Tavares[edit]

Hello, Clash Jester. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nikola Tavares, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 08:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nikola Tavares[edit]

Hello, Clash Jester. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nikola Tavares".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]