User talk:Classical liberal za

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Classical liberal za, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you

Please note that my messages on Talk Page are being changed by a couple of individuals to name you as a vandal. Please be aware of that. Also in updating the main article, as I have noted in my comments, South Africa Census has 4 distinct groups and Indian/Asians is one of them. For some reason, the admins have completely disregarded the vandalism of these individuals. Jansprat123 (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

black communities[edit]

Hi classical, I have filed a RfC on this topic in the meantime continue discussion on WikiProject SA seeing that this is still in dispute DumaTorpedo (talk) 16:40, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 01:46, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]