WPTR1000

Thanks for the article Borazan İsmail Çavuş. Would you like to add this article to the list in Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey) ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have already edited in WPTR1000. Four articles created by you have been added to the list by User:CeeGee. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 14:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Ihsan Özsoy a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Garchy (talk) 15:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC) Blondie (talk) 15:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC) Thanks![reply]

Block

Seems like I have been marked as a 'sock puppet' and blocked from editing. Not sure how this applies to me. Don't know how to appeal this but have no time now, i'll be back in the weekend.

Article

Akdeniz
Akdeniz
Artist	İlhan Koman
Location	İstanbul Levent

Kuşlar
Kuşlar
Artist	Kuzgun Acar
Year	1976
Location	Istanbul

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

ClintEastwood Blondie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message

Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Not autoblocked. Blocked directly, and you have provided no reason to believe the block is invalid. Yamla (talk) 12:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

-

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ClintEastwood Blondie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admin, The block on my account for the English wikipedia is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption. I have not caused any damage or disruption to the English wikispace in the past either, I have contributed positively, expanding the wikispace. Also I have not been maliciously using multiple accounts as I believe is suggested. Please consider my contributions in the past to evaluate. Thanks! --ClintEastwood Blondie (talk) 16:42, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ClintEastwood Blondie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admin, The block on my account for the English wikipedia is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption. I have not caused any damage or disruption to the English wikispace in the past either, I have contributed positively, expanding the wikispace. Also I have not been maliciously using multiple accounts as I believe is suggested. Please consider my contributions in the past to evaluate. Thanks!

I am hereby addressing the alleged reason for my block, (suspected malicious behavior)
There is no reason to think that unblocking me from the English wikipedia would cause damage or disruption to the English Wikipedia ClintEastwood Blondie (talk) 13:43, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 13:49, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ClintEastwood Blondie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admin, The block on my account for the English wikipedia is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption. I have not caused any damage or disruption to the English wikispace in the past either, I have contributed positively, expanding the wikispace. Also I have not been maliciously using multiple accounts as I believe is suggested. Please consider my contributions in the past to evaluate. Thanks! *I am hereby addressing the alleged reason for my block, (suspected malicious behavior using multiple accounts) *i have not abused multiple accounts and reject these accusations *There is no reason to think that unblocking me from the English wikipedia would cause damage or disruption to the English Wikipedia ClintEastwood Blondie (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A checkuser has confirmed that you have used multiple accounts in spite of Wikipedia's rules for account usage. Revoking TPA. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Using other Wikimedia wikis to contact editors regarding your block here

Hello. It is not acceptable to use other wikis to contact enwiki admins regarding your block. Your block here is a local issue, and needs to be resolved here through the established systems. If you continue to use other wikis to contact people regarding this block, I may need to lock your account globally or take other action to prevent you from continuing. Please stop. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 03:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]