User talk:Cloudreaver

Welcome!

Thank you

Thank you very much. I'm glad to be able to help. --Ionius Mundus 20:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:2005

Hi Cloudreaver-

It took me a minute to go back and find where we had a run in, but I remember clearly not. He does do things his own way from what I saw. I haven't been watching him lately, so I don't know what's he's been up to. I think you, if you're willing to, should get something started, since you seem to have the most recent conflicts with him. If you need help in the process, you know how to reach me; I'll be willing to help.

→ JARED ^(t) 13:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd very seriously consider participating in an RfC or some other action to curb this user's inappropriate editing. I'm not putting my name to anything before I see it, of course, but I'd be happy to put some work into this. Please keep me updated. Grindingteeth 01:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just leave a message here because I have replied to your question in my user talk page. Here's my reply:

Yes, it is sometimes hard to get messages over to User:2005. The 3 revert rule is a strict rule. It must be obeyed. If someone revert 4 times or more a day, I suggest reporting the incident in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR, so the admin will take actions, including warning, temporarily ban and permanent ban at the worst case.—Wai Wai (☎) 09:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rake Free deletion

Put what you want on the discussion page for the deletion. Any changes you make to the main article will be deleted. Essexmutant 23:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make any further edits to this page. If you do, I will be forced to block you from editing Wikipedia. Essexmutant 23:49, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipolicy prevents editing a closed deletion debate. If you wish to contest it, raise a deletion review. I assure you I have read IAR on numerous occasions, and I see no reason why an exception should be made just because you are unable or unwilling to progress through the review. Going through the process will allow your voice to be heard. I have removed the personal attack that you placed on my talk page. Essexmutant 23:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:2005

I'm considering starting an RFC process on 2005, based on User:Barberio/scratch as his behaviour has not improved. (Taking ownership of WP:EL, Personal Attacks, sloppy use of reverts...) Would you be interested in supporting or endorsing this? --Barberio 01:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World Sports Exchange marked for deletion

This article primarily consists at present of a list of services provided by the company and links to its websites. The information regarding Cohen's prosecution should probably be on a page about Cohen, not the company. As this article does not offer anything other than that beyond a list of services, I have marked it for deletion. If you disagree, please put a hold on it, but you should consider whether some content can be added that makes it appear to be something other than a vanity page with a negative comment inserted.

+Fenevad 23:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 00:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wingman.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wingman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 21:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yiruma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yiruma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yiruma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Walton (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Unity Young

The article Unity Young has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable boxer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 04:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]