User talk:Cmharts

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Citizenville.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 22:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Hello, I'm Vacation9. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Gov 2.0, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Vacation9 23:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cmharts. You have new messages at Vacation9's talk page.
Message added 01:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vacation9 01:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Author of Citizenville Book

Hello Excirial,

My name is Catie. I just submitted an article about Citizenville, which you denied because of this: No indication that the book passes the inclusion criteria set in WP:NBOOK. Gavin Newsom, the author of the book, I believe falls under guideline 5: The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the book's author is him/herself notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study.

Gavin Newsom has twice been mayor of San Francisco and is now Lieutenant Governor of California. Can you give me any further information as to what more I might need to include? Does his political career not make him a notable author?

Thank you for your time and I hope you are having a nice day!

————Catie Hart — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmharts (talk • contribs) 22:56, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi there Catie,

Unfortunately the answer to the last two questions would be no. While Gavin Newsom is notable enough for a biographic article, this does not mean that anything created or written by him is equally notable for inclusion (Notability is not inherited - being related to someone notable doesn't grant the related topic notability as well). If this would be the case every book written by a celebrity would automatically qualify for an article, not to mention anything else that might suddenly be notable due to being related.

Criteria 5 itself equally does not apply here. As the second part states: (To quality for this criteria) This does not simply mean that the book's author is him/herself notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study.. To put it as a jest: I doubt that there will be many college classes doing an academic analysis of Gavin Newsom. Criteria 5 is only intended for extremely well known writers such as William Shakespeare - In these cases any work written by that author tends to be analyzed and thus deemed notable.

As for what you can do for the article: Proof it is notable par the book policy trough criteria 1,2,3 or 4. Seeing as to how the book isn't even published yet i would say it is extremely difficult to near impossible for a biographical book to pass these criteria already though. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 21:44, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Citizenville concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Citizenville, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gov 2.0 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gov 2.0, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Citizenville

Hello Cmharts. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Citizenville.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Citizenville}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gov 2.0

Hello Cmharts. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Gov 2.0".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gov 2.0}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. (t) Josve05a (c) 02:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC)