User talk:Coal Press Nation 1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Coal Press Nation 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Always Pray for You, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GILO A&E⇑ 15:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Always Pray for You[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Always Pray for You requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 15:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Socking[edit]

Why do you keep creating new accounts? I told you this is not the way to go about editing Wikipedia. You should go back to using your old account. You can visit Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Versace1608 (Talk) 17:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

@Versace1608: The account is blocked an i have gone through that Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and i was told that it is too late to unblock my account so i had to make this and i don't get your massage by why do i keep making new account

I am going to take your name to SPI and you are going to get block again. You need to appeal your block at User talk:Coal Press Nation. Until your block is lifted, you shouldn't be editing here. Every time you create a new account, you are doing what's called socking. It is not the right thing to do. You are not the first person to get block on Wikipedia and won't be the last. Rather than create new accounts, address the reason for your block. If you understand the reason behind your block and promise not to violate Wikipedia's policies, your account will be reinstated. Trust me on this. Versace1608 (Talk) 18:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Nosa In 2013.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Nosa In 2013.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nosa Choc Boiz.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Nosa Choc Boiz.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Versace1608 (Talk) 21:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Socking[edit]

Bro, you didn't take my advice. I appreciate the work you do here but like I said in the past, you're going about it the wrong way. Go back to your old account and put in an unblock request. You should also list all the sock accounts you've created since your block. Plead with administrators and tell them that you understand what you did wrong and promise not to do it. I didn't put in an SPI request. I thought you would listen to my advice. Let us work together and right the wrong you did in the past. What do you say? Versace1608 (Talk) 17:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coal Press Nation 1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because i understand what i am been blocked for and i will not do it again Coal Press Nation 1 (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

An unblock request can only be made from the master account. That has in fact been done, so this one is redundant. Favonian (talk) 18:02, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coal Press Nation 1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because i understand what i am been blocked for and i will not do it again

Decline reason:

An unblock request can only be made from the master account. That has in fact been done, so this one is redundant. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Open Doors (album)[edit]

The article Open Doors (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails WP:NALBUM. Sources fail WP:RS and or are trivial in their coverage. Claimed charting for single is from dubious source and is insufficient to establish notability for the entire album. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple reliable secondary sources that establish encyclopedic notability, or this article may be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]