User talk:CocoaGirll

January 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anything has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anything was changed by CocoaGirll (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96622 on 2018-01-19T05:01:19+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Your edit summary at Brokers Nose stated "Added content to make it more lively. Some of the wiki pages are kinda dead no offence lol, but some just need wayy more description and describing words.. 😅". This isn't how Wikipedia works. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Peregrine falcon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Jimfbleak. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot NG (talk) 05:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary at State of Matter stated "Added content regarding time crystals as these are now a state if matter and considered a funtemental one aswell..)". This isn't how Wikipedia works. Further disruptive edits like this one will incur a vandalism ban and loss of editing privileges. Based just on the editing history above, this will be a final warning before action is taken. Thank you. Arianewiki1 (talk) 07:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More[edit]

I see that most of your edits have been adding unsourced content or disruptive, and all have been reverted. If you don't follow our policies and guidelines, you will be blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:42, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Magnolia677. bonadea contributions talk 09:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]