Jump to content

User talk:Codorado~enwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishGuy talk 19:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


OK, you have a particular point of view, and you want to see that on screen. However the changes you are undoing are the result of consensus building over a significant period of time, and represent the most neutral way of representing the information. If you would like to reopen the debate, please do so on the discussion pages of the relevant articles, and please do not simply undo what has been agreed. It is a much more constructive way of proceeding.

--Bcnviajero 10:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Neeutral point of view is needed in these articles. Stop vandalism. Thanks.--Codorado 12:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


An odd response. As I mentioned in the comments, you might want to have a look at what vandalism is in the context of Wikipedia. There has been a consensual solution in these articles, reached over a period of time, which you are removing consistently. You have a particular, politically-motivated, viewpoint, as is your right, but this viewpoint should not be forced on the article, and as far as possible neutrality should be sought. If you are not happy with the consensual solutions previously reached, please take your concerns to the relevant discussion pages, and reopen the debate, rather than engaging in edit warring. --Bcnviajero 13:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The only politically-motivated here, is you. The OFFICIAL NACIONALITIES can not been vandalism.--Codorado 13:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I did not say that you were committing vandalism, simply that you were using the word against others indiscriminently and incorrectly. That said, persistent edit warring in pursuit of a narrow political objective without debate amd discussion comes close to vandalism. Nobody has removed the Spanish flags that are so important to you, but there are additional flags to provide additional information. How you can object to these, especially on a page about the Catalan football team, is difficult to fathom. Likewise, the fact that you keep replacing the FC Barcelona weblink with www.fcbarcelona.es (instead of .cat or .com, as it is officially listed and promoted) gives an indication of your intentions. --Bcnviajero 14:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me why are you making this contradictoy actions: [1] [2]? In one side you delete the information because only state flags are accepted and in the other you are adding hilarious things as the coat of arms (¿?¿?¿?) of Plovdiv (¿?¿?¿?). Can you explain me why do you find so necessary to specify that Iniesta comes from Castille la Mancha if you don't accept in the FC Barcelona article also this kind of information? And by the way, can you explain me why you add all this flags but however you remove the Catalan flag from Pere Gratacós? I'd appreciate a bit of coherence, please.--Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 01:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's continue the discussion in the talk page of the article.--Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 01:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Miranda warning (Band)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Miranda warning (Band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. meshach 18:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted mostly because the article itself contained no claim to notability. I would recommend you write up a well-sourced article in your userspace first (for instance User:Codorado/Miranda warning (Band)) and move it to main space once it is completed. The speedy deletion criterion for bands are rather stringent, and unless the article starts well sourced and with clear indication of significance, it's likely to be deleted within minutes if not seconds. If you want, I can restore the previous version of the article to that user page of yours so you can finish it up. — Coren (talk) 18:58, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

23:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

11:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)