User talk:Codyfinke15
|
Wikipedia's banning policy states that "Any edits made in defiance of a ban may be reverted to enforce the ban, regardless of the merits of the edits themselves. As the banned user is not authorized to make those edits, there is no need to discuss them prior to reversion." |
 | This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Codyfinke (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to blocked for evidence. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |  |
Speedy deletion of Carly Cardinal[edit]
A tag has been placed on Carly Cardinal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WebHamster 15:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008[edit]
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Woods at Indian Field, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Don't remove AfD templates before the debate is closed. TheBilly (talk) 16:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)