User talk:Codyfinkekachoo

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Codyfinke (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Codyfinkekachoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Geoff ^T ^C 18:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Direct of Smart Tag to E-ZPass ?

I rolled back the re-direct to E-ZPass as it appeared to have been made in good faith, but without discussion and consensus. A better course would be to tag the pages(s) with a merge tag to seek discussion. (Here's where that process is explained: Help:Merging and moving pages.) It may well be that re-directing the article to E-ZPass is what should be done. Perhaps other editors will agree. Just a thought... Geoff ^T ^C 18:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I also rolled back the re-directs of I-Zoom, I-Pass and M-Tag for the same reasons. I just think some attempt to seek a consensus is in order before redirecting the pages to the E-ZPass article. Geoff ^T ^C 18:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Malforming sources

Per [1] and [2] at Jif (peanut butter), the statements modified are well cited; modifications to cited statements is generally not acceptable unless verified with other third-party sources. seicer | talk | contribs 00:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing on this path of editing without discussion or the malformation of sources and text could lead to a block, until you either respond on the article's talk pages or on this talk page. While I find that your contributions are in good faith, it is time consuming and tiresome to clean up after your edits, some of which have been unhelpful or incorrect. seicer | talk | contribs 02:17, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jif (peanut butter) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Merry Headcheese!-hexa Chord ² 02:06, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Supermarket Sweep constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --Merry Headcheese!-hexa Chord ² 02:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acroterion _(talk) 02:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]