User talk:Coemgenus/archive2009-1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Benjamin Harrison[edit]

Hey there. Just letting you know that archive.org hosts a collection of resources related to Benjamin Harrison (including this document that has quotations from his contemporaries and the press on what they thought of him). May be helpful if you ever choose to create any daughter articles on parts of Harrison's life. Probably some fascinating stuff in there though either way. BuddingJournalist 02:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Indiana Barnstar
Congrats on getting Benjamin Harrison to FA Quality! Being a top importance topic on our project, thanks! Keep up the good work Charles Edward (Talk) 03:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you are interested, I have also worked extensively on his grandfather, President William Henry Harrison and it is not too far off from FA. Charles Edward (Talk) 03:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009[edit]

Bonne et heureuse Année!

Happy New Year!
¡Feliz Año Nuevo!
Felice Anno Nuovo!
Prosit Neujahr!
Szczesliwego Nowego Roku!
С НОВЫМ ГОДОМ!

Frania W. (talk) 22:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ledbetter[edit]

I agree with the merge since the lady is not notable except as the name of the plantiff in a case. However, I don't want to get into a fight with anyone and to get blocked. From what I see in ANI, if you get blocked, most administrators will slap each other on the back and refuse to do anything. They will even make up excuses for the administrator. To avoid trouble, I don't want to voice an opinion. Ipromise (talk) 07:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited![edit]


This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

year links[edit]

Just FYI, the MOS no longer calls for the delinking of years. -- Kendrick7talk 17:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It does, actually. Coemgenus 02:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing there about years. -- Kendrick7talk 21:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed it does, Coemgenus. I'm surprised that Kendrick feels the need to lie about it. Tony (talk) 13:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's all currently heavily disputed, see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking. Anyone citing MOSNUM or MOSLINK as policy should know better at this point... —Locke Coletc 02:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harrison FAC[edit]

Thought you'd like to know that this FAC you participated in has been restarted. RlevseTalk 12:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited![edit]

You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
March 15, 2009

Time: 3pm
Location: Drexel University

RSVP

In the afternoon, we will hold a session at Drexel dedicated to discussing Wikimedia Pennsylvania activity and cooperation with the regional Wikimedia New York City chapter.

Are events like a Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia in our future?

In the evening, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local Italian restaurant.
This has been an automatic delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Berwick.jpg[edit]

File:Berwick.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:JamesFitzJames.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:JamesFitzJames.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary injunction and your use of my monobook script[edit]

Hi Coemgenus,

I have to let you know on your talk page that ArbCom has announced a temporary injunction against the "mass delinking of dates". You can still delink dates on an occasional basis; however, you may wish to be cautious and use the script only for its non-date functions until the issue is resolved by an RFC poll. You may wish to express your view on autoformatting and date linking in the RFC at: Wikipedia:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll.

Regards Lightmouse (talk) 22:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid such edits: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Savile,_1st_Marquess_of_Halifax&diff=prev&oldid=269753899
-- User:Docu

<moved from User talk:Docu>

Who are you, and why are you telling me what kind of edits I should make? Coemgenus 10:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

</moved from User talk:Docu>

Please check: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Date_delinking#Temporary_injunction -- User:Docu

GA Sweeps invitation[edit]

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 08:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited...[edit]

You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
June 14, 2009

Time: 3pm
Location: Drexel University

RSVP

In the afternoon, we will hold a session at Drexel dedicated to discussing Wikimedia Pennsylvania activity and cooperation with the regional Wikimedia New York City chapter.

Are events like a Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia in our future?

In the evening, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local sports bar.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of visualization created using Many Eyes[edit]

Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Retired_Supreme_Court_Justices_by_Appointment_and_Number_of_Days_in_Office.png Hi. I believe visualizations created using Many Eyes can be included in Wikipedia. Please let me know if you think otherwise.

Thanks Saqib —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saqib (talkcontribs) 23:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have received a confirmation from Many Eyes that they are fine with the use of visualizations created using Many Eyes in wikipedia. Saqib (talk) 05:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Company Newtown Line[edit]

Hey there, Coemgenus. I noticed you created many of the pages for the old Reading Newtown line, now owned by SEPTA. Have you seen the website dedicated to this line, r8newtown.com? The group behind restoring this service (Pennsylvania Transit Expansion Coalition [PA-TEC]) is making some great strides bringing the line back. If you are interested, I urge you to get involved. They are good bunch of folks and are working with all the big players.

Nice work on the articles!Oanabay04 (talk) 16:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]