Jump to content

User talk:Cogitari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
AnimWIKISTAR-laurier-WT.gif
Hello, Cogitari, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for registering an account.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay.


  Introduction

 5   The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Help
  Tips

  How to write a great article
  Manual of Style
  Be Bold
  Assume Good faith
  Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page.
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

kelapstick(bainuu) 08:28, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Hello, Cogitari! I'm Huon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Electronic_trial_master_file_(eTMF).
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#How do you see the reviewer's comments or details for why it was declined?. Huon (talk) 18:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Cogitari. You have new messages at Theonesean's talk page.
Message added 14:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TheOneSean | Talk to me 14:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Cogitari. You have new messages at Theonesean's talk page.
Message added 14:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TheOneSean | Talk to me 14:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Electronic trial master file (eTMF), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheOneSean | Talk to me 17:08, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trial master file may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trial master file may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • human use are specified in the document 'ICH Good Clinical Practices,' published in 1997 by the ICH[<ref>[http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-10/3cc1aen_en.pdf ICH Good Clinical Practice P.
  • File_system</ref>. Third, the TMF Reference Model artifact names contain characters such as '/', '(', '(', which are not allowed in many filesystem naming schemes. Fourth, with respect to the use of the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization[edit]

In this edit you seem to indicate that the lowercase words in the heading were due to a typo, which was not the case. In WP, we reserve caps for proper nouns; see MOS:CAPS. Headings and titles use sentence case, not title case, in WP. And words like "standard" that may be capitalized in some sources will not usually be in WP; only if they are part of a term that is consistently capitalized in sources, which these are not, in the section in question. Dicklyon (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. Along those lines, the subject of this article, Electronic Trial Master File, (eTMF) should be capitalized for two reasons: One, it represents a unique 'thing' and isn't a common noun; Two, it helps the reader to understand the source of the acronym 'eTMF' Your thoughts? Cogitari (talk) 14:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]