User talk:CoinageBritannia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, CoinageBritannia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sarratt. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 14:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Esunertos (September 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Potentially notable, but we'd need to see in-line citations that cover the lead paragraph and Etymology, otherwise this looks like WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. i.e. who says he was pre-eminent? who says it was dated from that period? that location? who describes the coinage? - I am sure there are academic papers or books discussing this person? Please also avoid the terms 'us'

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Esunertos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 20:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CoinageBritannia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 20:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I am awaiting the academic publications but thought it might take 4 months so I would get in early and edit as I go! Didn't expect a response in half an hour!

I have confirmation from Dr John Sills and Dr Daphne Nash Briggs regarding dating, typology and attribution but will need 48 hours for that to appear as online web links to attribute.

Is it best to notify you here about resubmission? CoinageBritannia (talk) 20:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William John Webster (April 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William John Webster and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 08:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]