User talk:Coldairplay

Nomination of Simon Phillips (author) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Phillips (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Phillips (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Msnicki (talk) 06:37, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello, Coldairplay. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing style gives off the extremely strong impression that you were sent here to create articles for various clients. Please understand that while there is no firm rule against paid editing it is highly discouraged because it's very easy for a paid editor to write with a promotional tone. If you continue to edit here you will have to disclose your conflict of interest on your userpage and you'll also have to read over the various guidelines very closely, as paid editors are under more scrutiny than the average editor. You will need to read over WP:RS, WP:GNS, WP:NPOV, and I'd also recommend that you create all of your articles via WP:AfC, since your articles are extremely promotional - enough to where I'm going to delete one (in your sandbox) as unambiguously promotional. Avoid phrases like "Data is changing the nature of competition. Making sense of it is tough." since that's very, very promotional and gives off the strong impression that your only reason for being here is to promote the article topic. I'd also like for you to read over this essay since it gives a brief overview about paid editing and what you should do - and why it's frequently discouraged. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I also have to ask: are you in the same company as User:Gemigem and User:Roundout? I ask this because you all tried to create or otherwise edit Jonathan Gabay in various formats and your versions are all identical. If you are, you will also need to disclose this and comment on their relationship on your userpage as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gemigem. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:41, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 02:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]